Senate majority urges Obama to press Iran over nuclear program

WASHINGTON Mon Aug 5, 2013 2:22pm EDT

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-NJ) speaks to the media after the Senate passed the immigration bill on Capitol Hill in Washington June 27, 2013. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-NJ) speaks to the media after the Senate passed the immigration bill on Capitol Hill in Washington June 27, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A majority of senators have urged President Barack Obama to raise pressure on Iran over its disputed nuclear program by toughening sanctions and renewing the option to use military force while also exploring diplomatic solutions.

The senators' letter to Obama came as Iran's President Hassan Rouhani, who has cast himself as a moderate and pledged to pursue less confrontational policies abroad, took office.

"We must be prepared to act and Iran must see that we are prepared," 76 senators in the 100-member body said in the letter, sent late on Friday ahead of Rouhani's swearing in on Sunday.

Until they see a significant slowdown of Iran's nuclear activities, "we believe our nation must toughen sanctions and reinforce the credibility of our option to use military force at the same time as we fully explore a diplomatic solution to our dispute with Iran," the senators said in the letter.

The letter, spearheaded by Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez and five other senators from both parties, urged Obama to demand Iran take immediate steps, including moving toward compliance with U.N. Security Council resolutions that say Iran must suspend enrichment of uranium.

"Iran needs to understand that the time for diplomacy is nearing its end," the letter said.

Western powers say the nuclear program is enriching uranium that could be used to fuel a nuclear weapon. Iran insists that the program is for peaceful purposes including power generation and medical devices.

U.S. and EU sanctions have had a deepening impact on Iran's economy over the last year and a half as they slashed oil imports, the country's main source of income.

The measures have already cut Iran's oil exports by more than half compared to pre-sanctions levels of about 2.2 million barrels per day, helping to devalue Iran's currency and contributing to a steep rise in inflation.

The Senate Banking Committee is expected in September to pass a version of tougher Iran sanctions that could further push down oil exports from the OPEC member. That comes after the House of Representatives passed a bill on harsher sanctions last week. The full Senate is expected to take up the bill sometime in the fall.

The White House declined to publicly back the sanctions bill passed by the House, in what could be a sign that the administration sees some hope in Rouhani's winning the presidency.

U.S. officials still favor economic pressure to force Tehran to halt the program, particularly as the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has the last say on Iran's foreign policy. But they have argued for a pause in new U.S. measures to see if Rouhani is interested in a nuclear deal.

(Reporting by Timothy Gardner; Editing by Ros Krasny and Cynthia Osterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
xcanada2 wrote:
AIPAC types: Dib, Dib, Dib!
US Senate: Dob, Dob, Dob

Aug 05, 2013 3:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PaulBradley wrote:
“Iran needs to understand that the time for diplomacy is nearing its end” . . . “we believe our nation must toughen sanctions and reinforce the credibility of our option to use military force . . . .”

How many of the 76 senators are holding dual American/Israel citizenship? In the absence of any evidence that Iran in fact has even intent to build nuclear bomb, this push to sound U.S. military action “drums” sounds very much as coming from Benjamin Netanyahu. (http://www.policymic.com/articles/56209/iran-s-nuclear-weapons-don-t-exist-no-matter-what-benjamin-netanyahu-says)

It’s absurd for the U.S. to continue spending trillions of dollars on behalf of Israel – - in terms of our military and/or any kind of economic support. Evidence is clear that any kind of reward to the U.S.A for all of this ridiculous spending is simply not there, only for Israel. Do we honestly believe that Israel is our “friend”?

Aug 05, 2013 3:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Dun wrote:
Americans have not benefitted from what we have done in the middle east. These invasions and occupations are destructive and wasteful. The shattering of Iraq was the most disgusting event I have ever witnessed.
And I am a Vietnam veteran. Now, while being pushed by Israel and it’s supporters, the US will strangle Iran. While veterans kill themselves or endure second rate rationed health care from the VA. This is the new world order sponsored by the USA.

Aug 05, 2013 7:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.