UPS pilots warned of low altitude 7 seconds before crash

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama Fri Aug 16, 2013 7:46pm EDT

1 of 5. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigators retrieve the flight voice and data recorders from the wreckage of UPS flight 1354 in this handout photo taken in Birmingham, Alabama August 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/NTSB/Handout via Reuters

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama (Reuters) - U.S. government investigators looking into the crash of a UPS cargo plane said on Friday the pilots received a low altitude warning barely seven seconds before the sound of impact, according to data recovered from the cockpit voice recorder.

Investigators retrieved data from the cockpit and flight data recorders on Friday that could shed light on Wednesday's fiery crash in Alabama that killed the jet's pilot and co-pilot.

"I personally breathed a huge sigh of relief once I learned we had good data," said Robert Sumwalt, a senior official with the National Transportation Safety Board. "We'll know everything that was said in the cockpit."

Sumwalt said a preliminary review of the voice and data recorders showed the pilots received the first of two audible warnings before the sound of impact can be heard, indicating the United Parcel Service Inc cargo plane was descending at a hazardous rate.

A warning system in the air-traffic computers at Birminghan's airport showed no indications the plane was approaching too low, Sumwalt said.

The cockpit voice and flight recorders arrived at the NTSB's headquarters in Washington late on Thursday, hours after they were pulled from a heap of melted plastic and debris at the crash site.

Preliminary results from the agency's investigation, which is still in its early stages, have shown no evidence of engine fire, and the pilots did not issue a distress call.

The Airbus A300 jet was approaching the runway at Birmingham-Shuttlesworth airport before dawn when it clipped the trees in an adjacent residential area and crashed well short of the runway.

An air traffic controller on duty told NTSB investigators he saw a "bright spark flash" that looked like a powerline breaking, Sumwalt said. The controller saw the plane's landing lights "followed by a bright, orange flash ... and then a red glow."

The NTSB has sent investigators to Louisville, Kentucky, to study the A300's maintenance records, officials said.

UPS identified the crew members who died as 58-year-old Cerea Beal Jr., of Matthews, North Carolina, and Shanda Fanning, 37, of Lynchburg, Tennessee.

Beal, the captain, who was at the controls on Wednesday, had been with UPS since 1990, and before that he served more than six years in the U.S. Marine Corps as a helicopter operator.

The NTSB said he had about 8,600 hours total flying experience, including more than 3,200 hours in the Airbus A-300.

(Additional reporting by Jane Sutton and David Adams in Miami; Writing by Tom Brown and Kevin Gray; Editing by Toni Reinhold, Leslie Gevirtz and Ken Wills)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (15)
209flyboy wrote:
I’m surprised that the news media hasn’t pre determined the cause before the black boxes reveal the truth to what happened. I would hope they’ve learned to keep their opinions to them selves until the facts emerge from the FAA investigation. I am tired of hearing the TV talking heads and inept reporters who know nothing about aviation report as if they knew what they were talking about. As a commercial pilot, I sincerely hope that when you fly on my plane that you remember the 45,000 people who die in car accidents every year. You’re a lot safer with me than down there.

Aug 16, 2013 1:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
gregbrew56 wrote:
What was particularly telling in some of the earlier articles were comments that a purely automated instrument approach has difficulty accounting for the hills in front of the chosen runway. Would a computer calculated glide slope take the plane *through* said hill? Were the pilots too complacent in depending on instruments/autopilot? With no indication of trouble before the aircraft hit the ground, this is going to be an interesting outcome as to cause.

Aug 16, 2013 3:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
gcf1965 wrote:
You are right to feel that way. It is rightfully called media these days instead of journalism or even the more mundane term news. Most outlets are only interested in entertainment and ratings….oh and campaigning for Democrats. Why is it so hard to investigate and report events instead of propagate opinions?

Aug 16, 2013 3:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.