Bangladesh charges U.S.-based rights group with contempt

DHAKA Tue Aug 20, 2013 7:22am EDT

Ghulam Azam (C), former head of Jamaat-e-Islami party, exits a court after the verdict of his trial, in front of the International Crimes Tribunal-1 in Dhaka July 15, 2013. REUTERS/Stringer

Ghulam Azam (C), former head of Jamaat-e-Islami party, exits a court after the verdict of his trial, in front of the International Crimes Tribunal-1 in Dhaka July 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

Related Topics

DHAKA (Reuters) - Bangladesh prosecutors on Tuesday charged Human Right Watch with contempt of court after the New York-based rights group criticized the conviction of a top Islamist politician on war crimes charges.

But it was not immediately clear what the move will mean, as Human Rights Watch does not have a resident representative in Bangladesh to stand accused.

Ghulam Azam, 91, the former head of the Jamaat-e-Islami party, was jailed for 90 years last month for masterminding crimes against humanity, genocide and other offences during the country's 1971 war of independence.

The rights group condemned the conviction as "deeply flawed" and said it failed to meet international standards of a fair trial.

"A petition seeking contempt of court proceedings against the Human Rights Watch has been filed in the war crimes tribunal," prosecutor Tureen Afroz told reporters.

Human Rights Watch had said judges improperly conducted an investigation on behalf of the prosecution, there was collusion among prosecutors, failure to protect defense witnesses and a lack of evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

"The problems with the Azam trial are manifold, and lead to the inescapable conclusion that there has been strong judicial bias towards the prosecution and grave violations of due process rights," Brad Adams, Asia director of Human Rights Watch, said.

Bangladesh has been hit in recent months by a wave of violent protests over war crimes convictions, presenting the government with a security and credibility challenge ahead of polls early next year.

Early this month, a court declared Jamaat-e-Islami illegal, effectively banning it from the election.

Six party leaders have been convicted of various crimes in connection with the war. Four of them were sentenced to death and two, including Azam, to life in prison.

(Reporting by Ruma Paul; Editing by Nick Macfie)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
loyalsys wrote:
Human Rights Watch has it all wrong this time.

A ninety-one year old needs three square meals and free health care. What better place to get it than at his country’s expense in a minimum-security prison. Like a hospital with free TV and a basketball court.

No wonder he got the cooperation of prosecutors and court. I’m 87 and I say good luck old timer and forget about the Human Rights Watch folks in this case.

Aug 20, 2013 6:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
loyalsys wrote:
Human Rights Watch has it all wrong this time.

A ninety-one year old needs three square meals and free health care. What better place to get it than at his country’s expense in a minimum-security prison. Like a hospital with free TV and a basketball court.

No wonder he got the cooperation of prosecutors and court. I’m 87 and I say good luck old timer and forget about the Human Rights Watch folks in this case.

Aug 20, 2013 6:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.