WikiLeaks says Manning jail term is 'strategic victory'

LONDON Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:49pm EDT

U.S. soldier Bradley Manning is escorted into court to receive his sentence at Fort Meade in Maryland August 21, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. soldier Bradley Manning is escorted into court to receive his sentence at Fort Meade in Maryland August 21, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - WikiLeaks on Wednesday said a 35-year jail term handed down to U.S. soldier Bradley Manning for leaking classified files to the pro-transparency organization was a "strategic victory" as it meant he was eligible for parole in less than a decade.

"Significant strategic victory in Bradley Manning case," WikiLeaks said on its official Twitter feed. "Bradley Manning now eligible for release in less than 9 years, 4.4 in one calculation."

In a full statement issued later, WikiLeaks said that Manning's trial and conviction had been "an affront to basic concepts of Western justice".

"The only just outcome in Mr Manning's case is his unconditional release, compensation for the unlawful treatment he has undergone, and a serious commitment to investigating the wrongdoing his alleged disclosures have brought to light," WikiLeaks said.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously praised Manning as "the most important journalistic source that the world has ever seen", but has neither confirmed nor denied whether Manning supplied WikiLeaks with classified documents, saying the group never revealed its sources.

"Mr Manning's treatment has been intended to send a signal to people of conscience in the US government who might seek to bring wrongdoing to light," WikiLeaks said in the same statement, saying the strategy had backfired. "As a result, there will be a thousand more Bradley Mannings."

(Reporting by Andrew Osborn and William James; Editing by Andrew Osborn)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
haggler wrote:
Right. And a life sentence would have been a “total victory.” WikiLeaks is full of c__p. It has become irrelevant. Media: may we move on to something meaningful? WikiLeaks is so totally 2000.

Aug 21, 2013 12:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
rthomas wrote:
sure does set an example of how we let the ” law of the land ” go down the tubes in the courts now.

Aug 21, 2013 1:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.