Afghanistan's Karzai says no rush to sign U.S. security pact

KABUL Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:17am EDT

1 of 2. Afghan President Hamid Karzai speaks during a news conference in Kabul August 24, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mohammad Ismail

Related Topics

KABUL (Reuters) - Afghanistan is in no rush to sign a pact with the United States setting out how many U.S. troops will stay after a NATO mission ends next year and may even delay a decision until after a presidential election, President Hamid Karzai said.

Foreign combat troops are due to leave Afghanistan by the end of 2014, when the NATO-led mission winds up and the responsibility for fighting Taliban insurgents is handed over to Afghan forces.

But NATO plans to keep a slimmed-down training and advisory mission in Afghanistan after 2014 although the United States and other NATO allies have been slow to provide detailed numbers of troops for the force.

The United States has been putting pressure on Afghanistan to finalize a bilateral security agreement (BSA), which will mandate how many, and where, U.S. soldiers will remain once the NATO mission ends.

U.S. diplomats have said they want the security pact signed by October, to prevent it becoming an issue in the campaign for next year's Afghan presidential election.

"Although the Americans asked for October, we are not in a hurry and if the document is agreed upon during this government, good," Karzai told reporters at his Kabul palace on Saturday.

"And if not, the next president can discuss whether to or not to accept it."

The collapse of a similar pact between the United States and Iraq in 2011 - sparked partly by Iraq's refusal to provide immunity to U.S. soldiers serving there - led to the United States pulling its troops out of Iraq.

In a recent interview with Reuters, the commander of international forces in Afghanistan, U.S. General Joseph Dunford, said he had talked "at every level from district and province to members of parliament ... to President Karzai" and he was adamant the pact would be signed.

NATO's former top military commander, James Stavridis, recently said he thought about 15,000 foreign troops should be kept in Afghanistan, made up of about 9,000 U.S. troops and about 6,000 from other countries.

But U.S. officials support a smaller force of 8,000 to 12,000.

Last month, a senior U.S. defense official said the United States could pull out all forces, the so-called zero option, in the event of a failure to reach a deal with Kabul on legal guarantees for troops.

Talks on the agreement were suspended in June after the opening of a Taliban office in Doha, which enraged Karzai when the Taliban displayed their banner and flag, a reminder of their repressive rule over Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001.

(Reporting By Mirwais Harooni and Hamid Shalizi; Writing by Dylan Welch; Editing by Robert Birsel)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (11)
Whiteathame wrote:
How about ZERO US troops staying as of …. yesterday.

Aug 24, 2013 7:47am EDT  --  Report as abuse
AZreb wrote:
Sounds like we are begging Karzai to keep accepting the money and our troops. To heck with him and Afghanistan, too. It’s about time we give Karzai and his government ultimatums: sign the agreement WE want you to sign – or else we take our troops and equipment out of Afghanistan and also our money, which sounds like a great idea and we should have done it long ago.

Aug 24, 2013 9:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
rickval wrote:
Just another war LOST by America, several thousands of lives lost or ruined, trillions of dollars spent on NOTHING. Good work America.

Aug 24, 2013 9:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.