Britain says Syria chemical attack evidence may already be destroyed

LONDON Sun Aug 25, 2013 2:25pm EDT

Britain's Foreign Secretary William Hague arrives at 10 Downing Street, in central London, July 15, 2013. REUTERS/Andrew Winning

Britain's Foreign Secretary William Hague arrives at 10 Downing Street, in central London, July 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Winning

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain said on Sunday that evidence of a chemical weapons attack in the suburbs of Damascus could have already been destroyed ahead of a visit to the site by U.N. inspectors.

Earlier in the day Syria agreed to let experts from the United Nations on Monday visit the site of the reported poisonous gas attack which killed hundreds of people on Wednesday of last week.

"We have to be realistic now about what the U.N. team can achieve," Foreign Secretary William Hague told reporters.

"The fact is that much of the evidence could have been destroyed by that artillery bombardment. Other evidence could have degraded over the last few days and other evidence could have been tampered with," he said, referring to opposition activists' reports that the army has shelled the area in the last few days.

Hague said that all evidence pointed towards the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government, and that such attacks demanded a strong international response.

"We cannot in the 21st century allow the idea that chemical weapons can be used with impunity," Hague said. "We believe it's very important that there is a strong response and that dictators ... know that the use of chemical weapons is to cross a line and that the world will respond when that line is crossed."

(Reporting by William James; Editing by Jon Boyle)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (19)
matthewslyman wrote:
Fully support this statement by Mr. Hague.

Aug 25, 2013 3:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
PaulBradley wrote:
“Hague said that all evidence pointed towards the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government, and that such attacks demanded a strong international response.”

It would be newsworthy if the article ‘spells’ the “evidence” so the reader could make informed opinion. Did any reporter had the notion to ask Mr. Hague as to “WHAT” evidence is he talking about???

Aug 25, 2013 4:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
oxen wrote:
Hague behaves more like a thug in his pronouncements than a leader of great a nation. Obama wants to bomb to cover up his weaknesses at home or revenge on Russia by hitting at an ally because of Snowden. It will be good for Russia to retaliate really hard if US/UK/France/Israel.Saudi/Turkey bomb Syria on reports delivered to them by Al-Qaeda cannibals who most likely used the chemical cocktail weapons. Obama & Hague do not want to wait for UN inspectors report. They just want to bomb and kill more people. Russia and China and Iran should hit back really hard too it Syria is attacked, the world is fed up with foolish greedy leadership in the west

Aug 25, 2013 4:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.