White House says it is undeniable that chemical weapons used in Syria

WASHINGTON Mon Aug 26, 2013 3:58pm EDT

A man, affected by what activists say is nerve gas, breathes through an oxygen mask in Damascus suburbs August 21, 2013 in this picture provided by Shaam News Network. REUTERS/Fadi al-Dirani/Shaam News Network/Handout via Reuters

A man, affected by what activists say is nerve gas, breathes through an oxygen mask in Damascus suburbs August 21, 2013 in this picture provided by Shaam News Network.

Credit: Reuters/Fadi al-Dirani/Shaam News Network/Handout via Reuters

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House said on Monday that it is undeniable that chemical weapons were used in Syria and that there is little doubt that the Syrian government used them.

President Barack Obama, said White House spokesman Jay Carney, is evaluating the appropriate response to the use of chemical weapons but has made no decision on how to respond. Carney had no time frame for when Obama would decide.

"There is very little doubt in our mind that the Syrian regime is culpable," said Carney. He said it is undeniable that the weapons were used in what he called a violation of an international norm.

(Reporting by Steve Holland and Mark Felsenthal; Editing by Sandra Maler)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Adam_Smith wrote:
Perhaps the Obama Administration has largely convinced itself that the Syrian regime is culpable but many outside the government remain skeptical. For example, Justin Raimondo at antiwar.com is calling it a “transparent hoax” and he is able to lay out reasons for thinking so.

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/08/25/transparent-hoax-could-lead-to-war/

The Obama Administration’s arguments seem very emotional and practically evidence free by comparison.

Aug 26, 2013 4:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Adam_Smith wrote:
Perhaps the Obama Administration has largely convinced itself that the Syrian regime is culpable but many outside the government remain skeptical. For example, Justin Raimondo at antiwar.com is calling it a “transparent hoax” and he is able to lay out reasons for thinking so.

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/08/25/transparent-hoax-could-lead-to-war/

The Obama Administration’s arguments seem very emotional and practically evidence free by comparison.

Aug 26, 2013 4:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
wilhelm wrote:
and there are certainly WMDs in Iraq somewhere, if they just keep looking…

Aug 26, 2013 4:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures