Remember bogus U.S. excuses for Iraq war before attacking Syria: China's Xinhua

BEIJING Tue Aug 27, 2013 3:56am EDT

United Nations (U.N.) vehicles transport a team of U.N. chemical weapons experts to the scene of a poison gas attack outside the Syrian capital last week, in Damascus August 26, 2013. REUTERS/Khaled al-Hariri

United Nations (U.N.) vehicles transport a team of U.N. chemical weapons experts to the scene of a poison gas attack outside the Syrian capital last week, in Damascus August 26, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Khaled al-Hariri

BEIJING (Reuters) - An attack on Syria would be dangerous and irresponsible, and the world should remember the Iraq war was started by U.S. allegations of weapons of mass destruction which turned out to be false, China's official Xinhua news agency said on Tuesday.

The United States has served Syrian President Bashar al-Assad notice that it believes he was responsible for chemical weapons being used against civilians last week.

Military chiefs from the United States and its European and Middle Eastern allies have met in Jordan for what could be a council of war, should they decide to punish Assad, who has denied using chemical weapons and blamed rebels for the attacks.

Xinhua said that Western countries were rushing to conclusions about who may have used chemical weapons before U.N. inspectors had completed their investigation.

"Such rhetoric, as well as the recent flurry of consultations between Washington and its allies, indicates that they have put the arrow on the bowstring and would shoot even without a U.N. mandate," Xinhua said in an English-language commentary.

"That would be irresponsible and dangerous. For starters, the current scenario is reminiscent of the lead-up to the Iraq War, which the United States staged with allegations about weapons of mass destruction that later turned out to be false."

Xinhua commentaries do not carry the same weight as government statements, but they can be read as a reflection of official Chinese thinking.

China has urged all parties not to jump to conclusions about the results of the U.N. probe, and has urged calmness in dealing with the accusations.

"In the heat of the crisis, all parties concerned should keep their heads cool, especially those impatient to take military actions without a U.N. mandate," it said.

"It is imperative that the Unites States and like-minded countries refrain from hasty armed invention and let the U.N. play its due part in determining how to act accordingly."

Russia, Assad's key ally and arms supplier, says rebel forces may have been behind the attack and has urged Washington not to use military force against Assad.

Moscow and Beijing have both vetoed previous Western efforts to impose U.N. penalties on Assad.

But China has been keen to show it is not taking sides and has urged the Syrian government to talk to the opposition and take steps to meet demands for political change. It has said a transitional government should be formed.

(Reporting by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Nick Macfie)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
kenradke11 wrote:
“It is imperative that the Unites States and like-minded countries refrain from hasty armed invention and let the U.N. play its due part in determining how to act accordingly.”

I’m sorry China and Russia but these atrocities should have demanded intervention a long time ago. War is inevitable so you can take a pill and chill out. The only answer is military intervention and Assad must be punished ASAP!!!

Aug 27, 2013 6:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tiu wrote:
The world hasn’t forgotten, only the “leaders” from the west… who haven’t forgotten either, they’re just so used to lying that it just comes out quick and smooth.
Sadly once democratic nations are now slaves to neo-con war junkies who obey orders from a small, vile, racist and fascist country invented less than 100 years ago.

Aug 27, 2013 6:23am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ralphooo wrote:
Unfortunately, it seems to me that Xinhua has it right. I distinctly remember statement after statement from the Bush administration about how Saddam Hussein had “used chemical weapons against his own people.” Whether Saddam did or not use chemical weapons turned out to be irrelevant, because the Iraq war caused far more harm than good. If I am wrong, someone ought to explain why we spent so much money and so many lives there, and in what way we helped anyone by starting that war.

Aug 27, 2013 8:10am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.