Corporate breaks at risk in U.S. plans to cut tax rates

WASHINGTON Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:04am EDT

U.S. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) arrives to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers and Vice President Joe Biden, to work on a legislative framework for comprehensive deficit reduction, at the Blair House in Washington May 10, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) arrives to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers and Vice President Joe Biden, to work on a legislative framework for comprehensive deficit reduction, at the Blair House in Washington May 10, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Billions of dollars in U.S. tax breaks prized by manufacturers, energy companies and other industries could be targeted for elimination when two powerful lawmakers are expected to introduce proposals to overhaul the United States' tax system.

The plans could be introduced as early as September and face tough odds in a Congress where disputes over nearly every tax and spending issue threaten a crisis.

Democratic Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and Republican Representative Dave Camp, head of the House Committee on Ways and Means, are crafting separate proposals to scrub the tax code of clutter and lower tax rates.

It is the most ambitious congressional effort in a generation, with Camp likely to move first.

The duo are considering trimming a slew of tax deductions and other breaks to offset the cost of cutting the top corporate and individual rates to as low as 25 percent, say aides and others. The corporate rate now tops out at 35 percent, while the highest individual rate is about 40 percent.

Baucus and Camp found the most common ground in potential corporate tax code revisions while working together on the congressional "supercommittee," a group of lawmakers who tried but failed to forge a debt deal in 2011.

"There were a lot of areas of agreement when they delved into the code," said a senior legislative aide involved in the supercommittee effort.

For example, both are open to tightening depreciation rules that govern how quickly companies can write off the cost of certain assets, and limiting a widely used manufacturing tax break known as the domestic activities deduction, said the aide, who worked for the panel.

Camp is the top tax-writer in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and Baucus leads the tax-writing Finance Committee in the Senate, where Democrats hold power.

The tax code has not been completely cleaned up since 1986 when a politically divided Congress forged a deal with Republican President Ronald Reagan.

It will be a heavy lift, but one sure to cause heartburn for those in the corporate world now enjoying the breaks under fire.

Baucus and Camp aim to enact legislation by the end of 2014.

Party leaders worry that forcing members to vote on legislation with tough choices on popular tax breaks may be futile, given a belief among many that Democrats and Republicans will not in the end come together on perhaps the most contentious issue - added revenue.

Nearly every U.S. policy maker avows support for tax reform that would mean trimming some of the $1.3 trillion in annual "tax expenditures" to offset lower tax rates.

Most Democrats, keen to finance social programs, insist an increase in revenue should be part of any overhaul; Republicans want the bill to be "revenue neutral," meaning the new system would raise the same amount of revenue it does already.


The two sides are much closer on how to deal with corporate tax rules than on personal tax rules, congressional aides say.

That is because for as much as corporations prize their breaks, individual American voters enjoy even bigger ones, such as the home mortgage interest deduction and the charitable write-off.

The biggest corporate expenditure is accelerated depreciation, which lets companies write off the cost of an asset more quickly than its useful economic life.

"It is pretty much impossible to design a corporate tax reform proposal which reduces the rate to the mid-20s without touching depreciation," said Marc Goldwein, a senior policy adviser with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a mainstream group supporting lower rates and trimming breaks.

Nixing these could yield $800 billion over a decade, according to the group. That alone could shave about five percentage points off the top corporate tax rate.

Touching it will be difficult because many Democrats worry about the impact on manufacturers.

Another potential target is the domestic production deduction - a write-off intended for manufacturing costs that critics say is often abused.

The tax break began as a 3 percent deduction from income derived from property manufactured, produced, grown or extracted in the United States and has since grown to 9 percent. A Congressional Research Service report said that one third of corporate activity may qualify for it.

A congressional report describes what staffers called the "Starbucks Footnote," which states that food processing qualifies, though not retail activities. Starbucks defends the break, saying it uses it for work done at its roasting plants.

Repeal could generate about $100 billion over a decade, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.

Another tax break facing bipartisan scrutiny is an accounting method known as "last-in, first-out accounting," a method of tracking inventory that President Barack Obama and some bipartisan tax reform groups have proposed scrapping.

"LIFO has to be repealed," to generate revenue for the revamp effort, a senior Republican staff member working on the tax overhaul said.

The method treats a company's most recently acquired goods as having been sold most recently, which minimizes the taxable profit of such goods. Businesses with inventories of goods with prices that tend to rise over time often use this method.

Energy companies are the biggest users of LIFO, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

"We have been all over the (Capitol) Hill for years, but does that mean we are not worried? No," said Jade West, a lobbyist for the LIFO coalition, which includes such trade groups as the American Petroleum Institute, representing the big U.S. oil giants.

Axing LIFO could generate $80 billion over 10 years, according to a Treasury Department estimate.

(Reporting by Kim Dixon; Editing by Howard Goller and Andrew Hay)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (8)
sylvan wrote:
Since the Supremes decided that “corporations are people, my friend”, why do they get their own deductions and tax rates? Can corporations now marry and get the married tax rate? Oh, only if the corporations are heterosexual, that way, the corporation can beget little small job creator companies that can grow into corporations one day, and live in their parents basements.

Aug 28, 2013 6:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Doc00001 wrote:
First of all,,,,Thanks for the comedy to sylvan. I like it when folks make a joke from our lawmaker’s idiotic conclusions. The counterfactual nature of their BS is appalling.

Next, how likely is it that any,,,and I mean ANY detriment imposed on corporate America will have a chance of becoming law? I just can’t believe that any douche bag politician is moving towards decency. More likely,,,, re-election is at hand. Gotta look like ya give a darn now don’t cha?

Aug 28, 2013 7:45am EDT  --  Report as abuse
deLafayette wrote:
This is game of fools. “Revenue Neutral” is not what the country needs.

Enhanced revenues to solidify Social Justice is required, that allows millions of Americans to lead a more comfortable life without the fear of a sudden catastrophe dumping them into poverty.

Thus unable to feed or house their children. While this millennium’s Robber Barons continue to feed of the fat of the land, on profits derived from the sweat of our brows.

Why oh why did we return Obama to the White House with his hands tied behind his backs because we did not throw the T-Party out of the HofR, where they continue to stymie any effort at stimulus-spending that would put Americans back to work.

If we need reform in the Tax Code it is NOT the piddling efforts of these two politicians. It is a revamp of the Tax Code that puts rates back up to where they were before Johnson (of all people) started bring them down and Reagan finished the hatchet-job – to the glee of those cronies who funded his election.

Wake up America, smell the coffee! Nothing can be done to really ‘n truly reform the Tax Code to make it more just until we get rid of the clowns who control the HofR. And elect even more reps to the Congressional Progressive Caucus, the largest single political bloc in the HofR.

Reforming America, with its multiple problems (of Income Unfairness and Crony Federal Politics) is going to take at least a decade – it cannot be done overnight. Let’s start with the HofR …

By dumping the T-Party (T for Troglodyte).

Aug 28, 2013 7:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.