Obama cites strategy to help Syrian opposition

WASHINGTON Tue Sep 3, 2013 10:39am EDT

U.S. President Barack Obama (2nd R) talks to bipartisan Congressional leaders in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington while discussing a military response to Syria, September 3, 2013. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. President Barack Obama (2nd R) talks to bipartisan Congressional leaders in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington while discussing a military response to Syria, September 3, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama said on Tuesday he was confident that Congress would vote in favor of U.S. military action in Syria and said the United States had a broader plan to help rebels defeat President Bashar al-Assad's forces.

During a meeting with congressional leaders at the White House, Obama called for a prompt vote on Capitol Hill and reiterated that the U.S. plan would be limited in scope and not repeat the long U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"What we are envisioning is something limited. It is something proportional. It will degrade Assad's capabilities," Obama said.

"At the same time we have a broader strategy that will allow us to upgrade the capabilities of the opposition," he said.

Obama said he was willing to address concerns among lawmakers about the authorization for force that the White House sent to Congress.

"I look forward to listening to the various concerns of the members who are here today. I am confident that those concerns can be addressed," he said.

"I would not be going to Congress if I wasn't serious about consultations and believing that by shaping the authorization to make sure we accomplish the mission, we will be more effective."

Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner, Democratic House leader Nancy Pelosi, and Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell were present at the meeting along with the chairs of congressional committees that deal with national security and the armed services.

Asked whether he was confident Congress would vote in favor of a strike, Obama said: "I am."

Obama reiterated his "high confidence" that the Syrian government used chemical weapons against its people. The president said that posed a serious national security threat to the United States and to the region.

Repeating the argument that administration officials have made central in their sales pitch to Congress, Obama said not holding Assad accountable would send the message to U.S. adversaries that international norms around issues like nuclear proliferation had little meaning.

"We are going to be asking for hearings and a prompt vote," he said. "I'm very appreciative that everybody here has already begun to schedule hearings and intends to take a vote as soon as all of Congress comes back early next week."

(Additional reporting by Mark Felsenthal; Editing by Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
COindependent wrote:
That begs the question…if we “upgrade the capability of the opposition” how do we distinguish between the rebels loyal to a new Syria and the Al Quada/Islamists who seek to impost a Sharia-based regime?

I think this President is delusional if he believes the war will end and the terrorists/Islamists will just go away. We are trading one problem (Assad) for a potentially greater problem. At least in Egypt the military was available to displace the MB. In Syria, it will result in a vacuum where any group or person not subscribing to the Al Quada doctrine will be summarily executed.

After all, they’ve already started killing the Alawites because their version of Islam is not “pure”.

Sep 03, 2013 10:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
SaveRMiddle wrote:
So this week it IS about intended regime change? We learned nothing from Bush43. Are Americans still being asked to pretend control over chemical weapons can be accomplished with NO boots on the ground?

And two years later, 100,000+ lives… how intact is the original rebel force? Let me guess. We don’t know.

Sep 03, 2013 10:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ConchKey wrote:
Why not try and pursued Russia and or China to enter Syria and remove all of the chemical weapons and not start a regional war. STOP THE KILLING

Sep 03, 2013 10:49am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.