Russia says there is still a chance for peace in Syria

ASTANA Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:11am EDT

1 of 2. A Free Syrian Army fighter looks through the scope of his sniper rifle at an area controlled by forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad in Aleppo's Al-Ezaa neighbourhood September 11, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Aref Hretani

Related Topics

ASTANA (Reuters) - There is still a chance for peace in Syria and the world must not let it pass, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Thursday as he prepared for talks with the United States on a plan to secure Syria's chemical weapons.

During a visit to Kazakhstan, Lavrov welcomed the Syrian government's acceptance of Russia's proposal that it place its chemical arsenal under international control following an August 21 poison gas attack in Syria's civil war.

"I am certain that there's a chance for peace in Syria," he said, adding a warning to U.S. President Barack Obama that military intervention in response to the chemical attack would further destabilize Syria and the wider region.

"Serious politicians cannot fail to understand the ruinousness of this plan," Lavrov said of potential air strikes in a meeting with students in Kazakhstan's capital, Astana.

Lavrov was to meet U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry later on Thursday to discuss the proposal, which has prompted Obama to ask Congress to postpone a vote to authorize a strike to punish Assad for the chemical attack that he blames on his government.

Russia said it had handed an "effective, clear, concrete" plan for securing Syrian chemical weapons to U.S. officials on Tuesday for review.

Citing a Russian diplomatic source, the Russian daily Kommersant reported that the four-stage plan would begin with Syria joining the global Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW).

Damascus would then declare its chemical weapons production and storage sites and allow OPCW inspectors to visit them, the newspaper cited the source as saying.

In the fourth stage, Syria would "decide, along with the inspectors, how and by whom the chemical weapons will be destroyed", it said.


The source said it was not clear who would destroy the weapons but that it was possible the United States and Russia would do it together, Kommersant reported.

Russia Foreign Ministry officials declined immediate comment on details of the plan or on the Kommersant report, which described the same actions Russian officials have said Syria would need to take under the proposal announced on Monday.

"It is undoubtedly necessary to provide for Syria to join the Chemical Weapons Convention, which would envisage Syria declaring its chemical weapons storage sites, revealing its chemical program," Lavrov said earlier on Thursday.

"On this basis, experts would determine what concrete measures must be taken to secure these sites."

According to Kommersant, if the United States accepts the plan, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon could make a statement supporting it and a resolution introduced to the U.N. Security Council.

Moscow believes the resolution "should not contain ultimatums or threats of force," Kommersant said, underscoring Russia's resistance to using the Security Council, where it holds veto power, to put pressure on Damascus.

Russia has been Assad's most powerful backer during the civil war that has killed more than 100,000 people since 2011, delivering arms and - with China - blocking three Security Council resolutions meant to pressure Assad.

An initial French draft resolution called for delivering an ultimatum to Assad's government to give up its chemical arsenal or face punitive measures. Russia has said that text is unacceptable.

(Additional reporting by Steve Gutterman in Moscow, Editing by Timothy Heritage and Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
Actions…everyone, especially politicians, say what you want to hear…where’s is some action?

Sep 12, 2013 5:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
mikeb270 wrote:
I think Russia is trying to be the fox chasing the hen in this one. while I think the disarms deal is good why is Russia of all countries involved trying so hard to get it to happen? too many questions pop up like Do the know the gov of Syria did really do it and want to stop the evidence that our gov says they have for them doing it from coming up at the UN?, Are they afraid because they supplied the Syrian Gov with the Chem-Weapons and think they will be held accountable next?
I don’t know but I think slow moving thru this or any dealings with the Russians is the way to go.

Sep 12, 2013 5:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
ruszen wrote:
YEAH, RIGHT! A GREAT WAY TO START!- -”An initial French draft resolution called for delivering an ultimatum to Assad’s government to give up its chemical arsenal or face punitive measures. Russia has said that text is UNACCEPTIBLE.”- – Nothing is going to get off the group with Russia, in fact, Russia needs to be taken OFF Syria entirely! Let Syria’s President ASSAD answer for himself! I don’t think the man wipes his (BLANK) without Putin stepping in and handing him the toilet paper! Russia is going to continue to look for was to prevent “intervention” in Syria in order to keep Assad in power like it Russia has continually done this past 2+ years sending arms and giving Assad political protection in the UN by it’s veto power! I think this agreement for Assad to turn over all his chemical weapons is a jOKE! It is a LIE, and he will probably find ways to hide them or not account for all of them! just like Opposition’s leader Idris has said! Everytime I read what the Opposition says, I believe them more and more, they are not lying! They and the 1,400+ victims of this attack are going completely ignored since this deal to surrender arms has come up, no further mention of the reason Obama sent the warships to the meditereanean, to PUNISH ASSAD FOR HIS CHEMICAL WEAPONS ATTACK ON INNOCENT PEOPLE…..what? Did everyone so quickly forget about this??!!!

Sep 15, 2013 10:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.