Fifth fatality feared in Colorado floods as towns evacuated

DENVER Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:39pm EDT

1 of 20. An aerial view of a farm house surrounded by flood waters along the South Platte River near Greenley, Colorado September 14, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/John Wark

DENVER (Reuters) - Colorado farming communities along the South Platte River were ordered to evacuate ahead of a predicted surge in the flooding, which may have claimed a fifth life and has left many still unaccounted for, authorities said on Saturday.

Four deaths have already been confirmed and, the Larimer County Sheriff's Office said in a Tweet, "a 60-year-old woman from Cedar Grove ... is missing and presumed dead."

About 200 people in eastern Colorado were unaccounted for, although authorities said some of those residents might be stranded or cut off from communication in the region's worst flooding in decades.

More heavy rain was expected as search-and-rescue teams used boats and helicopters to pull stranded residents to safety as flash flood waters toppled buildings, washed out roads and bridges and inundated farmland.

"Given the destruction, there is a high probability" of more fatalities, Boulder County Sheriff Joe Pelle said at a media briefing.

Two small farming communities in eastern Colorado were under evacuation orders as a surge from the flooding was headed in their direction on the plains, the Colorado Office of Emergency Management said on Twitter.

"The town of Orchard is in immediate danger. EVACUATE NOW," it said. "The town of Goodrich is under an evacuation order."

The flooding began overnight Wednesday. It was triggered by unusually heavy late-summer storms that soaked Colorado's biggest urban centers, from Fort Collins near the Wyoming border south through Boulder, Denver and Colorado Springs.

Boulder and towns along the Front Range of the Rockies north of Denver were especially hard hit as water poured down rain-soaked mountains and rushed through canyons that funneled the runoff into populated areas.

The National Weather Service in Boulder warned of scattered showers and thunderstorms later on Saturday and into Sunday that could trigger more flash flooding.


North of Boulder, Lyons was virtually cut off when flood waters washed out U.S. Route 36 and left residents without power and water for 48 hours.

Among those confirmed dead were a couple who stopped their car northwest of Boulder and were swept away by flood waters. Both bodies were recovered, the man's on Thursday and the woman's on Friday.

Another casualty was found in a collapsed building near Jamestown, an evacuated enclave north of Boulder, and still another, a man in Colorado Springs, about 100 miles to the south, officials said.

On Friday, Governor John Hickenlooper declared a disaster emergency for 14 counties from the Wyoming border to Colorado Springs. The declaration authorizes $6 million in funds to be used for flood response and recovery.

In neighboring New Mexico, where floods forced the evacuation of hundreds of people in Eddy, Sierra and San Miguel counties, Governor Susana Martinez on Friday declared a state of disaster, making funding available to state emergency officials for recovery efforts.

In rural Weld County, aerial TV footage showed large stretches of land covered in brown water, with homes and farms half-submerged.

Weld County sheriff's spokesman Steve Reams said bridges had been washed out and nearly every road in and around Greeley, Evans and Milliken was closed.

The flooding was the worst in the state since 1976, when nearly 150 people died in Larimer County in a flash flood along the Big Thompson Canyon.

The size and scope of property losses remain unquantified, with county assessment teams not likely to begin preliminary evaluation of the damage before early next week, once the water has receded, said Micki Frost, spokeswoman for the Colorado Office of Emergency Management.

(Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Gunna Dickson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (11)
amibovvered wrote:
Don’t mention th dams…

Sep 13, 2013 10:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SeniorMoment wrote:
Since the Denver, Colorado, Metro area is semi-arid and largely without a history of floods, it is likely the only homes and perhaps even businesses insured for flood damage are those in known flood plains and still paying a mortgage which requires federal flood insurance at probably 100 year floods.

A friend in the Boulder, Colorado, area also told me that there is severe damage to the area’s roads and highways. That is probably due to expansive clay soils.

Either all the federal disaster aid that will flow in will boast the state’s economy as reconstruction of roads and highways is done in addition to extensive building repairs, or a large number of homes may simply be abandoned and turned back to their mortgage company for lack of funds needed for repairs. The State of Colorado itself is unlikely to be a significant source of aid because Colorado has the nation’s strictest limitations on raising taxes and/or spending in the nation. In fact that TABOR law, which had been promoted by Douglas Bruce, requires that major disasters may be given funding contingent on subsequent voter approval of the action. Policy makers will not want to do that simply because if voters reject the spending after the fact the rest of the state’s budget has to be cut to recover what was spent. Although it is possible some changes have been made, since then, which was about a decade and a half ago, but my understanding is all that accomplished was turning the state government from never borrowing money to once where a significant chunk of current spending goes to pay for past spending in the form of principal and interest.

The extensive damage will put Colorado under extraordinary financial pressure at the state level unless the federal government waives the 10% state match for federal disaster assistance. At the least it may delay repairs for a year or more to put the funding to a vote of the people. It is actually a terrible way to run a state, and it works in such a way to shift funding to the local level where voters can waive the law for five years in a state with the state government paying far less of the total state and local government spending than in most states.

Sep 14, 2013 5:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Big2Tex wrote:
Typical disaster preparation for blue states. Support gay marriage, pot smoking, open border immigration, and removal of gun rights but do nothing to support natural disaster relief or economic stability. Ever hear of a “rainy day” fund? Colorado has its head in the clouds where the air and thinking are extremely thin.

Sep 14, 2013 8:57am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.