Rise of British anti-EU party threatens PM's re-election: poll

LONDON Sun Sep 15, 2013 12:03pm EDT

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron waits to meet Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas outside of 10 Downing Street in London, September 11, 2013. REUTERS/Toby Melville

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron waits to meet Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas outside of 10 Downing Street in London, September 11, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Toby Melville

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister David Cameron's hopes of being re-elected in 2015 suffered a setback on Sunday when a poll showed an anti-European Union party had split the center-right vote in dozens of decisive constituencies.

The poll focused on 40 of Britain's 650 parliamentary seats where Cameron's Conservative party won with the slimmest of margins at the last national election in 2010. It showed the main opposition Labour party had made little progress in the constituencies despite being ahead in opinion polls nationwide.

But a surge in support for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) was siphoning off support from the Conservatives, pointing to a Labour election victory, the poll showed.

If an election were held today, Labour would win 32 of the 40 battleground seats surveyed and would win overall power in Britain with a majority of about 60 percent, it said.

The survey, the first of its kind in two years, will worry the Conservatives who are preparing for their annual conference and have cut Labour's lead in some opinion polls to just three percentage points nationwide at a time when the economy is showing signs of recovery.

But Michael Ashcroft, the poll's organiser and a former deputy chairman of the Conservative party, said the new data showed the underlying picture was more complex and that the Conservatives faced a "formidable" challenge to stay in government, let alone win an overall majority.

The Conservatives govern in coalition with the smaller Liberal Democrat party.

"The picture is seldom uniform across the country; the national headline figures can sometimes mask what is happening in marginal seats where elections are won and lost," he said.

"Labour's lead in these seats has grown from nine to 14 points over the last two years, largely because of the defection of Tory (Conservative) voters to UKIP," he said, noting UKIP had tripled its share of votes in such marginal seats since 2010.

ANTI-EU, ANTI-IMMIGRATION

UKIP, which has no seats in the British parliament but is represented in the European Parliament, campaigns for Britain to leave the EU and for an end to what it calls "open-door immigration".

It has tapped into public disenchantment with what many Britons regard as the EU's excessive influence over their lives and into fears that immigration levels are too high.

The party did well in local elections earlier this year, winning one in every four votes cast, and is forecast to do well in European Parliament elections next year.

But Britain's "winner takes all" election system means it is unlikely to win a large number of seats in the national parliament in 2015.

Some lawmakers in Cameron's Conservatives want him to forge an electoral pact with UKIP to guard against a split vote and are likely to increase their calls for him to do so before 2015.

But Cameron and Nigel Farage, UKIP's leader, have had strained relations since 2006 when the Conservative leader said UKIP was full of "fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists".

Responding to pressure from within his own party and UKIP, Cameron earlier this year promised Britons an in/out EU referendum by the end of 2017 if re-elected.

Nearly 13,000 people were surveyed for the poll.

(Editing by Janet Lawrence)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Bob9999 wrote:
So the unintended consequence of UKIP success could be a Labour victory, which would likely guarantee continued UK membership in the EU, which the UKIP was created to oppose.

You have to give David Cameron credit for knowing how to keep to the middle course.

Sep 15, 2013 2:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tiu wrote:
It’s probably the Tories, under Cameron, performance driving voters away – more than UKIP attracting voters. Most people would have few other places to turn other than a rank outsider “independent” contender.

Sep 15, 2013 7:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AdamSmith wrote:
Immigration is destroying the American middle class. And the same thing is happening in Europe.

Labor, like any economic resource, obeys the law of supply and demand. If you dump labor into a market, it drives down the wage-rate.

The plain fact is that immigration into any modern country has two serious, lethal effects on the native-born citizens:

1. Immigration sharply drives down wage rates.
2. Immigration sharply drives up housing costs (rent rates).

Thus employers and landlords benefit from immigration.
Thus common workers are greatly harmed by immigration.

Immigration over the past 12 years caused more destruction of the American middle class than any other factor. The same has happened in Britain.

All other nations in the world, COMBINED, do not allow the levels of immigration that America is experiencing. It is the largest movement of human beings in the history of the world.

America’s and British leaders are criminals for allowing it to happen. And that includes the current senators and President. They are both owned by the wealthy class and multinational corporations.

The real question is, Why does America or Great Britain even have a military when we allow foreign nations to invade us by immigration?

Sep 15, 2013 10:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures