Qaeda tells Syria fighters to shun secularists in sign of deeper rebel rift

DUBAI Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:52am EDT

Related Topics

DUBAI (Reuters) - Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri has told the Islamist militants who are some of Syria's toughest opposition forces to avoid alliances with other rebel fighters backed by Gulf Arab states and the West.

His comment reflects a deepening rift between groups of the Western- and Arab-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) and guerrillas sympathetic to Zawahri's ultra hardline network, which seeks to wage a transnational armed campaign against the West.

Division among rebel fighters, as well as the influence of hardline Islamists, is one reason Western powers have hesitated to intervene in Syria's two-and-a-half-year-old conflict, in which more than 100,000 people have been killed.

In an audio speech released a day after the 12th anniversary of the 9/11 strikes, Zawahri said the United States would try to push opposition fighters to link up with "secular parties that are allied to the West", the SITE monitoring service said.

"I warn my brothers and people in the Syria of unity and jihad against coming close to any of these groups," he said. A full translation of Zawahri's remarks, containing the passage on Syria, was published by SITE on Sunday.

Zawahri's language makes clear he is referring to the FSA. Even though not all of the FSA's constituent groups are secular, its acceptance of support from the West and Gulf Arab monarchies renders it illegitimate in the eyes of al Qaeda.

Zawahri said events in Egypt supported his argument. He was referring to the July 3 removal of Islamist president Mohamed Mursi and the subsequent killing of hundreds of Islamists in a crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood, a proponent of the representative democracy al Qaeda abhors.

Rivalries have been growing between the FSA and the Islamists, whose smaller but better trained and equipped forces control most of the rebel-held parts of northern Syria.

The two sides have fought together from time to time, but the FSA, desperate for greater firepower, has recently tried to distance itself to ease U.S. fears any arms it might supply could reach al Qaeda.

In July, al Qaeda-linked militants assassinated one of the top FSA commanders, Kamal Hamami, in a demonstration of just how damaged relations have become.

Zawahri, suspected by many security specialists to be living in the Pakistan-Afghanistan border area, denied what he said were assertions by the West that al Qaeda was guilty of indiscriminate attacks on markets and mosques in Syria.

"All who shed the forbidden blood of a Muslim or non-Muslim, we are innocent of this act, and if they are from us then we will seek to hold them accountable," he said.

(Reporting by William Maclean; Editing by Louise Ireland)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (5)
sylvan wrote:
I hope Al Qaeda asked John McCain if this was okay since he is “friends” with the Syrian army. This just shows why this insurgency cooked up by Saudi Arabia and Israel is such a farce. The Free Syrian Army is a charade created for media legitimacy to help the military industrial complex weather the sequester nonsense by allowing them to sell arms overseas.

Sep 15, 2013 8:21am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Neurochuck wrote:
Why not get those US destroyers to fire 100 Tomahawks into the brigades from al Nusra, al Qaeda, Islamic State of Iraq and Levant and any others flying the white script on black flag ?
Then see who does not applaud.

Sep 15, 2013 9:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
westernshame wrote:
how does the saying go?

if you lie down with dogs, you will get up with fleas

it’ll be interesting to see how the fabricated opposition and the FSA will deal with their ex-allies. how long will it be before the US and west get involved citing the “war of terror” and humanitarian concerns?

Sep 15, 2013 9:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus