Senate leader: House must act first on government spending bill

WASHINGTON Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:02pm EDT

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks about ''Ending Senate Gridlock'' at the Center for American Progress Action Fund in Washington July 15, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks about ''Ending Senate Gridlock'' at the Center for American Progress Action Fund in Washington July 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on Tuesday that legislation to keep the federal government operating beyond September 30 must be passed in the House of Representatives before the Senate would consider a measure.

"It's up to the House. We're waiting for them to act. Until they act, we're going to do nothing," said Reid, the Senate's top Democrat.

Republicans in the House are fighting among themselves over how to pass a bill to fund the government in the next fiscal year that begins on October 1 and whether to attach a measure to either kill or delay the new national healthcare law known as "Obamacare" that they oppose.

(Reporting by Richard Cowan; Editing by Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
OneOfTheSheep wrote:
Can we agree that the existing deficit is irrefutable evidence that available tax revenue cannot support the “government we have”? If it is, then is our existing government not then, by definition, too big and expensive”? I question the veracity of those who oppose shrinking this bloated federal government and it’s dedicated legions of supplicants.

Those who would tame the our deficit by increasing tax revenue, the crack cocaine of the “political class”, advocate nothing less than putting out a fire with gasoline. When Washington proves year after year that it can not properly prioritize spending, i.e. separate needs from wants (and meet the needs), it is the height of folly to give it even more revenue to waste.

Show us taxpayers you know how to wisely administer the mind boggling allowance we presently give you “without strings” and we’ll THINK about raising it! NOT BEFORE!

Sep 17, 2013 5:18pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.