U.S. says open for Iran talks based on 'mutual respect'

WASHINGTON Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:10pm EDT

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani smiles during an interview with Ann Curry from the U.S. television network NBC in Tehran, in this picture taken September 18, 2013, and provided by the Iranian Presidency. Reuters/President.ir/Handout via Reuters

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani smiles during an interview with Ann Curry from the U.S. television network NBC in Tehran, in this picture taken September 18, 2013, and provided by the Iranian Presidency. Reuters/President.ir/Handout via Reuters

Photo

MH17 crash site

The aftermath of the Malaysian airliner crash.  Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is ready to engage in talks "on the basis of mutual respect" with Iran about its disputed nuclear program as long as Tehran is willing to demonstrate that its program is for civilian purposes, the White House said on Friday.

"We have had a number of engagements with the Iranians and we'll continue to have conversations on the basis of mutual respect," Josh Earnest, the deputy White House spokesman, told reporters aboard Air Force One during President Barack Obama's flight earlier in the day to Missouri.

"And over the course of those conversations there will be an opportunity for the Iranians to demonstrate through actions the seriousness with which they are pursuing this endeavor," Earnest said.

Obama and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani will be in New York next week for a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly. The White House has said that an encounter between the two leaders is possible.

Earnest said there was no meeting scheduled between Obama and Rouhani, but his comments were the latest signal from the White House that it views Rouhani potentially as someone with whom it can do business.

Western powers believe Iran is developing nuclear weapons. Tehran says its nuclear program is peaceful and aimed at power generation.

The positive tone in U.S.-Iranian relations, which have been fraught since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, worries Israel. It is warning the Obama administration not to be seduced by Rouhani's charm offensive.

A senior Israeli minister said on Friday that Iran is on course to develop a nuclear bomb within six months and time has run out for further negotiations.

But in a call with reporters to preview Obama's U.N. speech, deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said Washington believed there was time to pursue diplomacy with Iran.

"We've always made clear that there's not an open-ended window for diplomacy, that we need to be moving forward with a sense of urgency," Rhodes said.

"We do believe ... that Iran has not taken steps, for instance, to break out and weaponize its nuclear program. So even as we move with a sense of urgency here, we do believe that there's time and space to pursue diplomacy."

The New York Times reported on Friday that Iran is seeking a "swift agreement" over its nuclear program with the goal of ending sanctions that have devastated its economy.

Earnest, responding to that story, said the White House welcomed the new tone from Tehran after Rouhani's election in June and said sanctions had had their desired effect.

"These sanctions have tightened around the Iranian regime, further isolated them from the international community, taken a significant toll on their economy and put pressure on them to come back to the bargaining table," he said.

"The president has demonstrated a willingness to engage with the Iranians, and has done that for some time now," he added, noting that Obama and Rouhani had exchanged letters.

(Reporting by Roberta Rampton and Jeff Mason; Editing by Alistair Bell and Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
gregbrew56 wrote:
Perhaps that Nobel was deserved after all?

Sep 20, 2013 4:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Warof2010 wrote:
From a high of 65,000 active weapons in 1985, there are now some 4,400 active nuclear warheads and some 17,500 total nuclear warheads in the world in 2012.[2] Many of the decommissioned weapons were simply stored or partially dismantled, not destroyed

Non-Proliferation Treaty – Number of Active/Total Nuclear Warheads
United States 2,150 / 7,700 Signatory
Russia 1,800 / 8,500 Ratifier
U.K. 180 / 225 Ratifier
France 290 / 300 Ratifier
China n.a./250 Signatory

Non-NPT nuclear powers/Number of Nuclear Weapons
India n.a./ 90–110 Non-signatory
Pakistan n.a./ 100–110 Non-signatory
North Korea n.a. /

Sep 20, 2013 6:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Warof2010 wrote:
Following is just one of the U.S.’s nuclear delivery systems
the U.S. has 14 Trident submarines
each sub has 24 missiles
14 X 24 = 336 missiles (each missile has multiple (up to 12) independently targeted warheads/REBs)
Range: is greater than > 11,300 kilometres (>7,000 mi)
Maximum speed: > 6,000 metres per second (22,000 km/h; 13,000 mph)
each missile: Warhead (in USA usage only): nuclear MIRV up to four W88 (475 kt) warheads (Mark 5) or eight W76 (100 kt) warheads (Mark 4). The Trident II can carry 12 MIRV warheads but START I reduces this to eight and SORT reduces this yet further to four or five.
CEP: Requirement: 90–120 metres (300–390 ft).[2] That CEP demonstrated by flight tests is significantly better.

NOTE: the maneuverable equipment section that carries the Re-Entry Bodies (REBs)/warheads is appropriately referred to as a “bus” (dropping off “passengers” along its >7,000 route).

Sep 20, 2013 6:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.