Lawmaker proposes privacy advocate for secret court

WASHINGTON Fri Sep 20, 2013 3:11pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An outside lawyer could act as a public advocate on the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that oversees the U.S. government's electronic eavesdropping programs under a bill introduced Friday in the House of Representatives.

The court makes its decisions on government surveillance requests without hearing from anyone but Justice Department lawyers, raising deep concerns about whether enough is done to protect Americans' privacy.

U.S. Representative Adam Schiff, a senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said his plan would create a pool of independent attorneys to weigh in at the court on significant constitutional cases and reviews of major surveillance programs.

"Even though the FISC's deliberations are necessarily secret in nature, it's vital that the American people have confidence that there are voices within the process arguing forcefully and effectively on behalf of the Fourth Amendment and privacy concerns of ordinary Americans," Schiff said in a statement.

The court's activities have come under new scrutiny since disclosures by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden that the government collects far more Internet and telephone data than previously known.

The idea of allowing outside parties into the court has attracted some support.

President Barack Obama said last month he supported having a civil liberties representative weigh in on the court's deliberations.

Democrats Richard Blumenthal, Ron Wyden and Tom Udall, have introduced similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

In July, James Robertson, a retired judge who once served on the court, said the system would work better if some approximation of an adversarial system existed.

Robertson made his suggestion during a public meeting held by the bipartisan Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, which was set up in 2004 to advise the White House on civil liberties concerned raised by intelligence gathering.

Schiff's measure would enable that oversight board to set up the pool of independent lawyers.

(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
bullfrog84 wrote:
“Yeah, sure we’d love to have a independent party review everything, whats their phone number? Just so we can talk about they can be bought – I mean convinced to do the right thing.” – NSA/Government.

Sep 20, 2013 3:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Des3Maisons wrote:
This guy is joking, right?!?! The NSA repeatedly lied and misled the rubber stamp surveillance court about what they were doing. They are completely out of control. The court neither has the authority to control the NSA nor do they have any way of finding out what they’re doing. The whole system needs a complete overhaul from the top down, which includes heads at the top rolling. The American people would be fools to accept anything less.

Sep 21, 2013 8:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
SaveRMiddle wrote:
How stupid do they think we are?

On what planet does one find a lawyer who can’t be bought?

Sep 21, 2013 7:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.