U.S. lawmakers probe banks' debit card deals with colleges

WASHINGTON, Sept 27 Fri Sep 27, 2013 3:41pm EDT

WASHINGTON, Sept 27 (Reuters) - Democratic U.S. lawmakers are demanding to know whether U.S. banks paid money or gave gifts to college officials to set up student debit card programs that the legislators say are "fee laden" and inflate education costs.

Through these programs, the banks provide students with deposit accounts or debit cards to access their scholarship funds and student loans.

At least one bank working with legislators has said it does not think the debit card programs are beneficial to students and believes they should be cut back.

In a letter dated Sept. 26 the lawmakers said they fear such financial deals could open up students to exploitation through "fee-laden" debit cards that could raise the cost of their education and push students deeper into debt.

They also said they were concerned these arrangements could lead to abuse of the federal student loan system with funds being diverted to benefit the banks and the colleges.

The letter was sent to Wells Fargo, US Bancorp , PNC Financial Services Group, SunTrust Banks , TCF Bank, Citigroup, Huntington Bancshares, Commerce Bancshares, and Higher One Holdings.

The lawmakers include Representative George Miller, the senior Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee; Senator Dick Durbin, the assistant Senate majority leader; and Senator Elizabeth Warren, a member of the Senate Banking Committee.

They demanded that the banks provide lists of institutions with which they have such agreements, information on how many accounts the banks have opened, the fees collected over the last three academic years, and what the colleges were paid in return.

"At a time when college costs are increasing and college students are drowning in debt, the federal government must ensure the integrity of student financial aid programs and step in if financial aid dollars are being diverted through deceptive or predatory practices," the letter said.

A spokesman for Wells Fargo said the bank looked forward to providing the requested information.

Higher One said that it has been working directly with several congressional offices and has already shared much of the information requested.

"We don't believe this model prioritizes the student's best interests and we are completely committed to this practice diminishing," Higher One's spokeswoman Shoba Lemoine said.

The other banks either declined to comment or did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment.

In a May 2012 report, the U.S. Public Interest Research Groups, a collection of non-profit advocacy groups, expressed concerns about the aggressive marketing involved in these agreements and weaker protections for the students.

The group found nearly 900 card partnerships between colleges and financial institutions at the time and that students were subject to extra fees including per-swipe fees, inactivity and overdraft fees.

The Consumer Bankers Association said in a statement that those kinds of relationships can provide value to both the colleges and the students and often provide "low-cost, high-convenience financial products" tailored to the students' needs, and that banks are obligated to be transparent in such dealings.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
MichaelFaith wrote:
I have received financial aid at two different colleges–one being a community college and the other a state university. At the university, which I currently attend, I have to deal with Higher One. What this means is that if I do not keep my money with them, opting instead to support a local credit union, I will not have access to the funds for at least a week. The result is that I cannot afford to buy the textbooks I need until after course work is already due. The flip side is that at the community college, they simply handed the financial aid check the first day of class. Sure, we had to wait in a long line, often more than half an hour, but at least I was always able to procure what I needed to further myself academically. Higher One is most definitely having a negative impact on higher education but, and I’m just guessing here, it’s likely done in an attempt to reduce the labor overhead associated with handling financial aid disbursement. This brings us back to the idea that offloading labor, even to a domestic firm, is not without negative consequence. If the institution exists to prepare people for the future, should we not empower people rather than hamper them?

Sep 27, 2013 8:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.