Google pays $55 million tax in Britain on 2012 sales of $5 billion

LONDON Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:04pm EDT

A Google logo is seen at the garage where the company was founded on Google's 15th anniversary in Menlo Park, California September 26, 2013. REUTERS/Stephen Lam

A Google logo is seen at the garage where the company was founded on Google's 15th anniversary in Menlo Park, California September 26, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Stephen Lam

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Google, which has been grilled twice in the past year by a UK parliamentary committee over its tax practices, had a UK tax bill of 35 million pounds ($55 million) in 2012, on sales of $4.9 billion to British customers, its accounts showed.

The Internet search giant paid a tax rate of 2.6 percent on $8.1 billion in non-U.S. income in 2012, because it channeled almost all of its overseas profits to a subsidiary in Bermuda which levies no corporate income tax, the group's accounts show.

Corporate tax avoidance has risen to the top of the international agenda in the past year with the G20 and G8 groups of leading economies promising to get to grips with the growing practice of companies diverting profits from where they are earned and into tax havens.

Google said it follows all tax rules in every country where it operates and that it does not pay much tax in Britain because its profits are not generated by its UK employees.

Google UK Ltd, and other subsidiaries across mainland Europe, pay little tax because they are designated as providers of marketing services to Google Ireland Ltd, the Dublin-based subsidiary whose name appears on invoices to most non-U.S. clients.

Google declares little profit in Ireland because the unit there sends almost all of the profit earned from the non-U.S. clients to the Bermudan affiliate, in the form of license fees for the use of Google intellectual property.

The parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC) grilled Google's Northern Europe boss, Matt Brittin, in May after a Reuters investigation showed the company had advertised dozens of jobs for salespeople, despite Brittin telling the committee last year that the company does not pay tax on its UK revenues because it does not conduct sales from British territory.

A PAC report later accused of Google of using "contrived" mechanisms to avoid tax and called on the government to change the rules on taxing multinational companies.

Google's Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt said attempts to force technology companies to pay more tax could stymie innovation.

Google's UK tax charge on 2012 income was only 11.6 million pounds, with 24 million being payable in relation to employee share based remuneration.

(This story has been corrected to fix sales to UK customers to $4.9 billion, not $5.5 billion, in first paragraph)

(Editing by Louise Ireland)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
S0MA wrote:
step1: feign altruism
step2: profit in billions globally
step3: enact global shell-game
step4: claim all tax filings are ‘legal’
step5: pretend steps 2-4 support step 1

Sep 30, 2013 11:31am EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Subsidiary in Bermuda. Well then Bermuda better step up and start fighting some terrorism and keeping shipping lanes open near the Suez Canal. Because….. capitalism is not free.

Sep 30, 2013 11:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
“Google’s Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt said attempts to force technology companies to pay more tax could stymie innovation.”

Huh? Is he really saying that if they had to pay something remotely like the legislated tax rates in the nations in which they operate that Google would decide it wasn’t worth earning the astronomical sums they still would keep? Is this some kind of idiotic threat? Never thought I’d hear Google spilling Tea Party bait. Greed I understand. But stupidity coming from Google is a surprise.

Sep 30, 2013 12:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.