U.S. opposes tech companies' request to reveal spying demands

WASHINGTON Wed Oct 2, 2013 5:06pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department has told a secret surveillance court that it opposes a request from technology companies to reveal more about the demands they receive for user information, according to court papers released on Wednesday.

Negotiations between the federal government and companies such as Google Inc have gone on for months, and while U.S. spy agencies said they plan to be more transparent, they have opposed company requests to disclose more detailed data.

The court papers were filed under seal on Monday in the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, a body originally created to curb intelligence abuses.

Microsoft Corp, Yahoo! Inc, LinkedIn Corp and Facebook Inc are among the companies seeking permission to publish statistics about the extent of the demands placed on them.

Britain's Guardian newspaper and the Washington Post, using former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden as a source, reported beginning in June the companies' deep involvement with U.S. surveillance efforts.

The companies said some of the reporting was erroneous, so they want to reveal, for example, how many of their users are encompassed in surveillance demands and the total number of compulsory requests under specific laws.

The Justice Department said in its response: "Such information would be invaluable to our adversaries, who could thereby derive a clear picture of where the government's surveillance efforts are directed and how its surveillance activities change over time, including when the government initiates or expands surveillance efforts involving providers or services that adversaries previously considered 'safe.'"

The surveillance court has not yet ruled publicly on the companies' request.

(Reporting by David Ingram; Editing by Vicki Allen and Jim Loney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
brotherkenny4 wrote:
Can anyone cite an example of a secret police organization that hasn’t eventually become abusive and aided in the downfall of the nation they supposedly are there to protect?

Oct 02, 2013 11:51am EDT  --  Report as abuse
2Borknot2B wrote:
Then they are hiding from the people that they are supposed to represent. Cloak and Daggers! Tech companies develop your own tracking to track them and share info with each other and all of US. Find out what their hiding that way.

Oct 02, 2013 12:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Lemming wrote:
The damage has already been done pertaining to our rights as citizens of America. The moment the “Patriot Act” was enacted it enabled every established rule to go out the window. The Patriot Act is exactly how it sounds a war on Americans and their personal liberties/freedom. Our government possesses information on every American they deem a risk to their beloved so called National Security! J Edgar Hoover style… pathetic.

Oct 02, 2013 2:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus