Norway's Conservatives clinch coalition deal

SUNDVOLLEN, Norway Mon Oct 7, 2013 3:44pm EDT

Chairman of the Norwegian Conservative Party Erna Solberg (R) and Chairman of the Progress Party Siv Jensen make an announcement at Sundvolden Hotel, some 40 km (25 miles) from Oslo, October 7, 2013. REUTERS/Vegard Grott/NTB Scanpix

Chairman of the Norwegian Conservative Party Erna Solberg (R) and Chairman of the Progress Party Siv Jensen make an announcement at Sundvolden Hotel, some 40 km (25 miles) from Oslo, October 7, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Vegard Grott/NTB Scanpix

Related Topics

SUNDVOLLEN, Norway (Reuters) - Norway's center-right parties agreed on the terms of their coalition government on Monday, promising to lower taxes, reduce the economy's reliance on the vast oil sector, invest heavily in infrastructure and curtail immigration.

The Conservatives, led by prime minister-designate Erna Solberg, and their smaller ally, the populist Progress party, cleared one of the last major hurdles with the deal, paving the way for the two to take power on October 18 after winning elections last month.

"There are areas where we disagree but fewer than many would have believed," Solberg, 52, told a news conference. "Even though Norway is a fantastic country, some people fall through the safety net. ... we will try to plug the holes."

Solberg's government will rule in a minority after failing to win over several small centrist parties. But minority governments are common in Nordic countries and the Conservatives have enlisted the formal outside backing of the Liberals and the Christian Democrats to ensure stability.

The deal, which did not divide up cabinet posts, also puts the anti-immigration and anti-tax Progress Party in government for the first time in its 40 years - a big shift for a party that has spent years softening its image and was until now considered too radical for government.

The new coalition is to maintain restraint in spending oil money, upholding the current spending cap, but officials said there was some leeway under the rule and it would lower taxes for the average wage earner, gradually wind down the wealth tax and abolish the inheritance tax.

Keeping to promises of increased infrastructure investments, the coalition parties also agreed to set up an extra-budgetary fund for projects like road and rail building to the tune of 100 billion crowns ($16.75 billion) over the next five years.

In oil policy, the government promised to keep offering new areas for exploration to energy firms, a major demand from the sector, but will keep several environmentally sensitive Arctic regions closed to exploration.

Coalition parties also promised to strengthen Petoro, the state holding firm that owns minority stakes in most oil licenses, by providing it more cash, and said they would prioritize enhanced recovery as Norwegian fields mature.

In immigration, the parties agreed to tighten asylum rules, limit the appeals process and make it easier to deport asylum seekers.

Although both parties said they would consider breaking up Norway's $790 billion oil fund, the world's biggest sovereign wealth fund, their platform stopped short of such a move and instead promised a review.

(Additional reporting by Alister Doyle; Writing by Balazs Koranyi; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
Factoidz wrote:
Guess they’ve had enough bad consequences from their liberal immigration policies now.

Oct 07, 2013 3:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
DMHoffman wrote:
“…abolish the inheritance tax.” That is not usually a good idea in the long run. It can help increase the creation of very out of touch trust fund families after a couple generations. See Walmart as an example.

Oct 08, 2013 6:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.