Hoyer: Democrats stumped by flurry of Republican demands

WASHINGTON Mon Oct 7, 2013 2:49pm EDT

U.S. Congressman Steny Hoyer (D-MD) speaks to the 2013 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) convention in Orlando, Florida July 15, 2013. REUTERS/David Manning

U.S. Congressman Steny Hoyer (D-MD) speaks to the 2013 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) convention in Orlando, Florida July 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/David Manning

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Even if Democrats were willing to negotiate over reopening the government and lifting the debt ceiling, they wouldn't know where to start because of confusing signals from Republicans, the second-ranking Democrat in the House of Representatives said on Monday.

House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said it is unclear what Republicans want, with many conservatives clamoring to roll back President Barack Obama's healthcare law and House Speaker John Boehner saying he will not raise the debt limit unless Obama negotiates on ways to reduce deficits.

"It is such a roller-coaster of inconsistencies that it's hard to follow what they want and what they would take," Hoyer of Maryland told Reuters in an interview. "It's hard to find out how we can get out of this place they've put us in."

As the government shutdown neared the end of its first full week and an October 17 deadline to raise the debt limit drew closer, Obama and his Democrats have refused to negotiate on Republican demands over these issues. Democrats have said they would not be threatened into negotiations, and first the government must be funded and borrowing authority increased.

If the government were reopened and the threat of default were removed, Hoyer said he would gladly launch talks to try to narrow differences between Democrats and Republicans on spending. He said Democrats have already compromised on this front by accepting automatic spending cuts that were part of the stop-gap measure to fund the government that has stalled in Congress, prompting the shutdown.

Hoyer said Democrats have made it clear they won't accept changes to Obama's signature healthcare law, but that many Republicans don't believe this. No Republican has offered specific demands on spending cuts or tax changes in exchange for raising the debt limit, he said.

"It's hard to know how we compromise. Compromise with what?" he said.

On Sunday, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, a driving force behind the Republican push to block the healthcare law, said Republicans want three things before raising the debt ceiling: a plan to reduce spending, a promise for no new taxes and measures to "mitigate the harm from Obamacare," the widely used name for the law to expand health insurance coverage.

Hoyer contended there are enough Republican votes in the House to pass a funding resolution without conditions to reopen the government. It is less clear whether there are enough Republicans to vote for a clean debt limit increase, he said.

Boehner said on Sunday that a debt limit increase without any conditions would not pass the House, where Republicans hold a 233-200 majority.

Hoyer said that should be put to the test by bringing the funding and debt limit bills to the floor. "Show the American people that there aren't the votes," he said.

(Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Nurgle wrote:
These people are so unqualified to be making the decisions with which they are tasked it is not at all funny. Voters wake up – please ensure that you understand what decisions are being daily made, and that your candidates have the appropriate skill-set to address them. I don’t necessarily associate myself with any party, but the current Republican agenda is a complete cluster of nonsense. Reduced spending? Yes! – and start by cutting an outrageous defense budget in half. No new taxes? Only if the current system is overhauled to eliminate the bias toward the wealthy. Eliminate corporate welfare by increasing the minimum wage to a livable amount. ACA doesn’t go far enough! Our outlays for healthcare as a country are ridiculous under the current system. Who needs insurance companies at all? They are non-value add middlemen. What the heck does my employer have to do with where I seek medical attention? It should be nothing.
The generalities being bandied about have little or no basis in fact. Communicate specifics and the objective basis for these positions.
The situation we have now is unqualified, money-grabbers who get their “research” from the very people most affected by the issues – because there’s no money for objective staffers. Dysfunctional is being kind. The lack of effectiveness and accountability is appalling. We must change the acceptable standard of performance through our vote and relentless communication to our elected officials.

Oct 07, 2013 3:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Republicans demand to see Obama’s birth certificate again, have it inspected by Donald Trump. Again. “We will pass no budget with someone not born in Amurca.”

Says Ted Cruz, born in Canada.

Oct 07, 2013 4:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Boehner is the biggest coward in Washington. Too afraid of the Tealiban to even allow a vote (that he knows will pass), he’d rather bring down the government and the economy than lose his cushy job as Speaker. They’ll never be satiated though, sooner or later they’ll give him a Conservative Purity Test that even he’s not stupid or crazy enough to take on.

Oct 07, 2013 6:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.