Factbox: When could the debt ceiling put the United States in default?

WASHINGTON Mon Oct 7, 2013 3:11pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is careening toward what could be a calamitous default on its debt because of political dysfunction in Washington. The U.S. Treasury has said it will hit the nation's $16.7 trillion debt cap by October 17.

Following are some questions and answers about how and when default could happen.

- How could the United States default?

Washington takes in about 70 cents in taxes for every dollar it spends, so it must borrow to pay its bills. This would be easy as there are plenty of investors who want to lend America money. The problem: Congress put a ceiling on government debt and lawmakers haven't struck a deal to raise it.

- So will Washington go broke on October 17?

No, but it will be dangerously low on cash. The government has been scraping up against the debt ceiling since May, and now looks set to hit it around mid-month. When it does, the Treasury thinks it will have about $30 billion in the bank. Because it won't be able to add to the national debt, bills will have to be paid with incoming revenues and cash on hand.

- How long will the money last?

Not long at all. The Congressional Budget Office thinks the United States would start missing payments on at least some of its obligations between October 22 and the end of the month. No one knows the exact day because you can't know what tomorrow's tax revenues will look like.

- The United States defaults when the money runs out, right?

It depends how you define default. Historically, default is when a country misses a payment to a creditor. The Obama administration says default would include any missed payment, such as payments for public health insurance. The first really big bill due after hitting the debt ceiling is a $12 billion Social Security payment on October 23.

- When would financial markets melt down?

Markets would be alarmed if it looked like bondholders would go unpaid for an extended period, and might even panic if any government checks were delayed. Many analysts think the administration would at least try to prioritize payments on the national debt, but Treasury officials say picking and choosing which bills to pay would be impossible. The first debt payments due after hitting the debt ceiling are on October 17, 24 and 31. The first of those shouldn't be a problem, according the CBO analysis. But there might not be enough money for the payments due on the 24th or the 31st.

- How would default affect the economy?

It would sink like a stone. Once default began, the government would have to slash its spending overnight by about a third. The fiscal drag, if it lasted a full year, would be the equivalent of up to 4.2 percent of national economic output, according to calculations by Goldman Sachs.

That doesn't take into account the potential for a financial crisis. If investors lost their cool, stock markets could tumble, hitting pension funds and leading consumers to spend less of their money. Credit markets could freeze up because investors around the world might reassess the value of U.S. debt, which serves as collateral for trillions of dollars in loans and other financial transactions. The Treasury has warned a default could trigger the worst recession since the Great Depression.

- Is there an easy way out of this?

Washington's army of policy wonks have floated all sorts of ideas that could in theory resolve a debt ceiling crisis. Treasury could mint a $1 trillion dollar coin and deposit it at the Federal Reserve, magically topping up government coffers. The Obama administration could unilaterally raise the debt ceiling by invoking the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which some scholars read as prohibiting a default.

The White House has ruled out both approaches. That they are even being considered speaks to the manufactured nature of Washington's crisis. The United States isn't at risk of default because its economy is failing. Its political system is just increasingly dysfunctional, and the most plausible resolution to crisis would be a deal between the White House and Congress.

(Reporting by Jason Lange; Editing by Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
xyz2055 wrote:
WE do not need to mint a $1T coin. Section 4 of the 14th Amendment is absolutely clear. The debt shall not be questioned. Congress is Constitutionally obligated to pay the debt. Should they refuse to do so, they would be in violation of the 14th Amendment. Furthermore, when the law that created the Debt Ceiling impedes payment of the debt, that law is also in violation of the Constitution. The President would be in violation of the 14th Amendment if he did not provide a solution to this issue. The President could Constitutionally invalidate the Debt Ceiling and the Treasury would be free to borrow and pay the obligations enacted by Congress. Congress can not use the debt as a bargaining chip..plain and simple. The President has a Constitutional right to demand that Congress honor our obligations unencumbered.

Oct 07, 2013 6:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
eJunior wrote:
@xyz2055 Why raising the debt is the optimal solution for the 14th amendment? What about cutting spending and selling governmental assets?

Wouldn’t that be the optimal legal solution? Also, the other proposed solutions also seems plausible, mint a $1T coin would be both constitionally right and dont violate the debt ceiling at the same time.

Oct 07, 2013 6:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Selling governmental assets? We already do that. It’s called oil and gas leases. It’s not enough though? We should be selling National Park lands to Chinese hedge funds or something? Maybe sell some ports to Dubai like Bush wanted to do. Then didn’t when he learned where Dubai was?

Oct 07, 2013 7:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.