Afghanistan risks becoming 'narco-state': U.N. official

VIENNA Wed Oct 9, 2013 11:02am EDT

Poppy flowers are seen in full bloom in a field in the eastern province of Jalalabad, April 7, 2013. REUTERS/ Parwiz

Poppy flowers are seen in full bloom in a field in the eastern province of Jalalabad, April 7, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/ Parwiz

VIENNA (Reuters) - Afghanistan risks becoming a "full-fledged narco-state" without international support to help create alternative jobs for its people, a senior United Nations official said on Wednesday.

Yury Fedotov, head of the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), painted a bleak picture of Afghanistan's narcotics problem before next year's withdrawal of NATO-led combat forces.

He said the presence of those forces generates roughly one third of investment and jobs in Afghanistan, and that the gap when they are gone should be filled to prevent matters getting worse.

A regular UNODC survey due later this month will show cultivation as well as production of opium increasing compared with 2012, Fedotov told Reuters in an interview.

Afghanistan is the world's top producer of opium, from which heroin is made and which helps fund the Taliban's insurgency.

"The situation is worsening, that is clear and very disappointing," Fedotov, a Russian national, said.

It is "a very serious setback but we need to take that as a warning shot", he said, calling for redoubled efforts.

The Afghan government will need more help fighting poppy cultivation, once most foreign forces leave by the end of 2014, taking their cash and air power with them, experts say.

Drugs provide funding for the insurgency and threaten regional stability and the health of people in Afghanistan, which suffers the world's highest addiction rate, Fedotov said.

"That is also fertile ground for corruption and other forms of transnational organized crime. It is a multi-faceted challenge and we need to take that as a serious problem.

"Otherwise we have a serious risk that without international support, without more meaningful assistance, this country may continue to evolve into a full-fledged narco-state," he said.

Almost 12 years after U.S.-led forces invaded Afghanistan, large swathes are under Taliban control and Afghan troops still rely heavily on foreign air support, especially in remote areas.

NATO plans to keep a training and advisory mission in Afghanistan after 2014, although the United States and its allies have been slow to provide detailed troop numbers.

Fedotov said the political will existed in Afghanistan to fight the drugs problem, but increasing seizures, arrests and eradication efforts had so far failed to stem the tide.

Afghan farmers needed better infrastructure and new markets for legal products, he said. More agricultural and industrial jobs were required for any shift away from the drug economy.

"We have not been able to develop an alternative economy in Afghanistan," Fedotov said. "With all our efforts, it was very hard to move from illicit to licit."

(Editing by Alistair Lyon)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Lemming wrote:
The U.N. needs to quit sniveling and deal with it on their own without U.S. money, troops or anything else for that matter involving the U.S.! Afghanistan has to make its money somehow and as long as there’s a market for dope “terrorists” will continue to peddle it to fund so called Jihad. Here’s a novel idea why don’t you have China, Russia and Iran throw their own money down the toilet fighting a losing battle.

Oct 09, 2013 11:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
hardquestions wrote:
Afghanistan supplies >80% of the world’s opium. The infiltrators in Kashmir since 1948 have been Afghans/Pashtuns who would like to grow opium in the fertile soil of Kashmir valley. The Kashmiris – Hindu and Muslim are victims.

Oct 09, 2013 11:15am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MikeBarnett wrote:
BECOMING ??? Afghanistan passed that phase millennia ago. The 1840′s Opium War between Britain and China was fought to allow Britain to sell opium in China, a trade that China regarded as a crime. The British turned their House of Lords into the House of Drug Lords, and Victoria became the Opium Queen. People have used various plants and plant extracts for their narcotic effects for thousands of years, and the area now known as Afghanistan has been on the trade route between Europe and Asia to cater to all needs and desires of traders.

@Lemming

Russia, China, and four of the “stans” in the SCO have agreed to watch Afghanistan after the US and NATO leave in 2014. They have conducted joint military and police exercises in 2013 that will continue in 2014 and beyond. They live in the area, so they will spend their rubles and renminbis, allowing the US and NATO to save dollars and euros. They may not be as “polite” as the US and NATO, but they may be more effective because they must win. They cannot retreat to North America and hide behind oceanic moats if they fail.

Oct 09, 2013 3:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.