Accused Colorado gunman's computer used to search 'rational insanity'

CENTENNIAL, Colo. Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:59pm EDT

James Holmes sits in court for an advisement hearing at the Arapahoe County Justice Center in Centennial, Colorado June 4, 2013. REUTERS/Andy Cross/Pool

James Holmes sits in court for an advisement hearing at the Arapahoe County Justice Center in Centennial, Colorado June 4, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Andy Cross/Pool

Related Topics

CENTENNIAL, Colo. (Reuters) - A computer belonging to accused gunman James Holmes, who claims he was insane when he shot dead 12 Colorado moviegoers last year, contained an internet search for the term "rational insanity," a police officer testified on Thursday.

The revelation came during testimony by Aurora Police Detective Michael Leiker at an evidentiary hearing for Holmes, who faces possible execution if convicted of the rampage that also left 70 others wounded or injured.

However, Leiker said he could not say for certain that the onetime University of Colorado neuroscience graduate student was the one who entered the search term, its context, or when it was done.

Thursday's hearing centered on a defense motion to bar Leiker and others who extracted data from Holmes' computers, smartphones and other devices from testifying at the murder trial, which is scheduled to begin in February.

"Admission of unreliable evidence and opinion testimony would not only violate the rules of evidence but also Mr. Holmes' constitutional right to due process of law under the state and federal constitutions," his public defenders said in a written motion.

Holmes, 25, is charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder and attempted murder for opening fire in a suburban Denver cinema last July during a midnight screening of the Batman film "The Dark Knight Rises."

The California native has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity, and his lawyers have said in court filings that their client was "in the throes of a psychotic episode" when he went on the rampage.

Under Colorado law, prosecutors must prove a defendant who invokes an insanity defense was not insane at the time of the crime.

Holmes underwent a court-ordered sanity examination over the summer, but the results have not been made public.

Shackled and unshaven, Holmes was more animated on Thursday than he has been in previous hearings, smiling as he talked with one of his lawyers in the courtroom.

Arapahoe District Court Judge Carlos Samour Jr. said at an earlier hearing that court staff will mail out jury summonses to 6,000 county residents.

The judge also said in an order this week that prospective jurors should expect to serve from six to eight months, and jury selection alone could take up to three months.

Another series of pretrial hearings are scheduled to resume next week.

(Editing by Tim Gaynor and Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
urall5150 wrote:
6,000 person jury selection pool.

3 to 6 months for a juror.

Compared to the justice system, the animal holmes is as right as rain.

Send him to Texas.

Oct 10, 2013 12:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
This guy has been play acting “nuts” ever since his apprehension. This was a planned out mass murder, and he planned to use the “Insanity” defense right from the beginning. Everything, from the crazy look in his eyes (every time a camera was on him) to the goofy beard and crazy hair colors . . . All just part of the plan. I don’t care if he is crazy or not, as long as they lock him up until he’s at least 90!

Oct 11, 2013 10:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Alex77 wrote:
If we aren’t smart enough to understand when to quickly execute people, how to make our own effective and “humane” drugs for execution, and when insane people need to be in new age secure care centers for the insane maybe we aren’t smart enough provide any kind of public safety. We spend enough on security but look at the reports yesterday on a new wave of bad guys planning terror with so called “dry runs” while our agencies openly say they don’t care. Is that rational insanity?

Oct 12, 2013 2:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.