China rebukes Dalai Lama for seeking Tibetan independence: state media

BEIJING Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:54pm EDT

The Dalai Lama greets the audience before his conference ''A guide to the way of life of Bodhisattva'' in Mexico City, October 12, 2013. REUTERS/Edgard Garrido

The Dalai Lama greets the audience before his conference ''A guide to the way of life of Bodhisattva'' in Mexico City, October 12, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Edgard Garrido

Related Topics

BEIJING (Reuters) - A senior Chinese official has denounced the Dalai Lama's long-standing pursuit of autonomy for Tibet, describing it as equivalent to advocating Tibetan independence, state media said on Saturday.

The comments by Zhu Weiqun, chairman of the ethnic and religious affairs committee of the top advisory body to parliament, signal that China would probably refuse to pursue a compromise with the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader.

The Dalai Lama, who fled China in 1959 after an abortive uprising against Chinese rule, is considered a violent separatist by Beijing. The India-based Dalai Lama says he is merely seeking greater autonomy for his Himalayan homeland.

"In the fundamental sense, 'high-level autonomy' means Tibet's independence," Zhu was quoted as saying in the China Daily newspaper. "It is separated into two steps. The first step is so-called autonomy. The second one is actual independence."

The Dalai Lama's brand of autonomy "is against China's autonomy system and does nothing but insert secessionist elements into China's regional ethnic autonomy law", Zhu was quoted as saying.

The Dalai Lama's approach, called the "Middle Way" by Tibetans, seeks a Hong Kong-style autonomy for the region, with Tibetans to respect Chinese sovereignty over their homeland but have a greater say over religious and cultural affairs.

Some Tibetan activists have expressed frustration with the "Middle Way" and have pressed for independence, not just autonomy. Years of autonomy talks between the Dalai Lama and the Chinese government broke down in 2010.

Tensions over the issue are at their highest in years after a spate of self-immolation protests by Tibetans, which have led to an intensified security crackdown.

More than 120 Tibetans have set themselves alight since 2009, mainly in heavily ethnic Tibetan areas of Sichuan, Gansu and Qinghai provinces rather than in what China terms the Tibet Autonomous Region.

Most of those who set themselves on fire have died.

China defends its iron-fisted rule in Tibet, saying the region suffered from dire poverty, brutal exploitation of serfs and economic stagnation until 1950, when Communist troops "peacefully liberated" Tibet and introduced "democratic reforms" in 1959.

On Monday, China denounced a decision by a Spanish criminal court to indict former Chinese president Hu Jintao for genocide as part of an investigation into whether his government committed abuses in Tibet.

(Reporting by Sui-Lee Wee; Editing by Paul Tait)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
Tibet was given independence by some drunken Chinese warland 900 years ago… As they say, a Chinaman gives you freedom, and a Chinaman can take it away…

Oct 19, 2013 2:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
at7000 wrote:
“The Dalai Lama is considered a violent separatist by Beijing.” This official party line of pure B.S., serves China’s propaganda needs quite well.

Oct 19, 2013 3:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Donyod wrote:
Instead of quibbling about the slippery boundaries of words, Beijing needs to do something concrete about the relationship of power that exists between Beijing and Tibet, with the former directly ruling the latter rather than allowing any degree of actual local decision-making! They can free Tibet, or at least free-up their tight-fisted iron-booted rule of the region. Either way would be so much better for Tibetans than the current setup. The best way is to talk to His Holiness the Dalai Lama and the 200,000 survivers and descendents of people who voted with their feet to leave when Beijing’s PLA took over, with a million people losing their lives during one decade thanks to Beijing! There is a lot to answer for, so why this “more of the same” blah-blah Beijing? It’s silly and crazy and stupid. But above all tiresome.

Oct 19, 2013 5:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures