Hawaii begins debate over whether to legalize gay marriage

HONOLULU Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:05pm EDT

Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie reads a quote from the Dalai Lama as he gives testimony in support of same sex marriage during a Senate hearing at the Hawaii State Capital in Honolulu October 28, 2013. REUTERS/Hugh Gentry

Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie reads a quote from the Dalai Lama as he gives testimony in support of same sex marriage during a Senate hearing at the Hawaii State Capital in Honolulu October 28, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Hugh Gentry

HONOLULU (Reuters) - Hawaii started debating on Monday a proposal that would make the popular wedding and honeymoon destination the 15th U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage, repealing a voter-approved constitutional amendment that banned gay matrimony.

Democratic Governor Neil Abercrombie appeared as the first witness in support of the measure with more than 1,800 people signed up to address the state Senate Judiciary Committee during a special session called by the governor.

The debate this week in Hawaii, which allows civil unions, comes at a time of increasing momentum for gay marriage in the courts, at the ballot box and statehouses across the country.

The governor stressed that the proposal was crafted to address opponents' concerns that legalizing gay marriage would infringe on religious freedom. The proposal exempts clergy and churches from having to perform same-sex marriages.

"Our whole focus has been on trying to accommodate the First Amendment here with respect to people's religious rights, and that's been done in good faith," Abercrombie said.

Hearings in the state House of Representatives are scheduled to open on Thursday.

Democrats hold an overwhelming majority over Republicans in both chambers - 24-1 in the Senate and 44-7 in the House - virtually assuring passage of a gay marriage bill.

GAY RIGHTS GAINING MOMENTUM

The special session was originally expected to last five days, but there is already talk of the legislature taking two weeks to complete its work.

Abercrombie, who served more than two decades in the U.S. House of Representatives before running for governor in 2010, signed a same-sex civil unions bill into law two years ago and has since been a vocal proponent of gay marriage.

His immediate predecessor, Republican Linda Lingle, vetoed a civil unions bill in 2010.

Just one year ago, only six states and the District of Columbia recognized same-sex marriage. That number has more than doubled since then, due in most cases to litigation over the issue.

Maine, Maryland and Washington state became the first three states to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples by popular vote with passage of ballot initiatives last November.

In June, the U.S. Supreme Court forced the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states where such unions are legal and upheld a lower-court decision throwing out a state ban on gay matrimony in California.

And last week New Jersey Governor Chris Christie dropped his legal opposition to gay marriage, making his state the 14th to legalize same-sex weddings.

The New Mexico Supreme Court is expected to decide by year's end whether same-sex marriage should be recognized statewide rather than county by county, and the Illinois legislature is also considering the issue.

(Reporting by Treena Shapiro; Writing by Steve Gorman; Editing by Dan Whitcomb and Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
2tellthetruth wrote:
Treating ALL citizens equally (as ‘promised’ in the Constitution) is hardly the equivalent of “the road to hell”, hawkeye. More like the road to … equality.

Sooo ‘scary’. (Not.)

Oct 29, 2013 3:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
2tellthetruth wrote:
I’ve read the arguments against equal marriage, and they ALL boil down to religious beliefs or procreation.

And, since the State cannot ‘establish’ anyone’s religious beliefs over anyone else’s, the only solution is to allow equal marriage.

No religious person has ever been (nor ever will be) forced to have one, and no clergyperson has ever been (nor ever will be) forced to perform one.

Procreation is not a requirement of marriage for anyone, so that’s not a pertinent argument either.

Oct 29, 2013 3:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ocrt wrote:
There is every reason why religious conservatives should fight to prevent same-sex couples from being married in their churches if it is against their religious beliefs. But marriage is essentially a secular function: one obtains a marriage license, is married by a person licensed by the government, has their marriage registered by the government, and sometimes is divorced by the government. As long as the U.S. remains a constitutional democracy and not a theocracy, same-sex marriage should be legal, and the more progressive faith groups that value marriage by all loving, committed couples should have the religious freedom to be able to marry same-sex couples.

Oct 30, 2013 7:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.