White House faces tough sell in Congress on delay of Iran sanctions

WASHINGTON Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:11pm EDT

Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) speaks to reporters during the 14th day of the partial government shut down in Washington on October 14, 2013. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) speaks to reporters during the 14th day of the partial government shut down in Washington on October 14, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Top Obama administration officials have been pushing U.S. lawmakers hard to hold off on new sanctions over Iran's nuclear program, but some key lawmakers said on Wednesday they had not yet been convinced to support a delay.

Senator Bob Corker, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a member of the Senate Banking Committee, which is considering the sanctions package, said lawmakers were skeptical because they felt they had to push the White House to back strict sanctions on Tehran.

"It's incumbent upon them over the next 24 to 48 hours to persuade folks like me and others that the course of action they want to follow is a sound one," Corker told Reuters.

"I think ... because Congress had to push the administration into the sanctions regime in the first place, there is a degree of skepticism. But from my standpoint I'm certainly open to listening," he said.

Corker had a breakfast meeting on Wednesday with Secretary of State John Kerry. On Thursday, Kerry and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew were to hold a classified briefing on the status of talks with Iran for the Senate banking panel.

"The point that they are making is that they are at a point in these negotiations where they believe that additional sanctions coming out of the committee are counterproductive to the negotiations that are under way," Corker said.

The banking panel had been expected to vote on the sanctions in September, but held off after the Obama administration asked for a pause while negotiations with Tehran got under way.

Democratic Senator Tim Johnson, the banking committee's chairman, is waiting to hear from Lew and Kerry and will finish consulting with colleagues before making a decision on how to proceed, an aide said.

Senator Mark Kirk, a Republican member of the banking panel who is a strong backer of tougher sanctions, said he opposed any further delay.

"Every day the Senate delays consideration of new sanctions, Iran installs more centrifuges, enriches more uranium and improves its nuclear breakout capability," he said, referring to the ability to enrich uranium for use in a bomb.

"If Iran is capable of negotiating while violating international law, the United States should be equally capable of negotiating while imposing new sanctions pressure," Kirk said in a statement.

Washington and its allies believe Tehran is developing the ability to make a nuclear weapon, but Tehran says the program is for generating power and medical devices.

International talks over Iran's nuclear program revived after self-described moderate President Hassan Rouhani took office in August. The talks got under way this month and Iran, Britain, China, France, Russia, the United States and Germany will meet November 7-8 in Geneva for a second round.

Sanctions imposed in 2011 by Washington and the European Union have combined to slash Iran's oil exports by more than 1 million barrels a day, depriving Tehran of billions of dollars worth of sales and helping drive up inflation and unemployment.

The House of Representatives passed its version of a stiffer sanctions package in July by a 400-20 vote, seeking to slash Iran's oil exports by another 1 million barrels a day, to nearly zero.

(Additional reporting by Timothy Gardner; editing by Jackie Frank)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
Jonathan77 wrote:
There has never been a good reason for sanctions against Iran. Israel is the country that has nuclear weapons. Israel is the country that has recently bombed its neighbors. Israel is the country that has defied UN resolutions to end its occupation of Palestine. Israel is the country the United States should be sanctioning.

Oct 30, 2013 8:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Adarvan wrote:
I cannot wait until something like this happens to Americans, where a foreign country holds the American economy hostage with sanctions. Imagine the outrage! I honestly don’t feel bad any more when I hear Americans moan about losing their jobs to foreign competitors overseas. Until Americans elect a government that’s less hateful and more compassionate toward the lives of other people, then they deserve every economic catastrophe that they can get.

Oct 30, 2013 9:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
EmeraldDruid wrote:
The differences with Iran should have been settled a long time ago. Which is just one more glaring symptom of our failed foreign policy that’s being dictated from Tel Aviv. If ANY country should have crippling economic sanctions placed on it, Israel should. Until such time as Israel also signs the NNPT and allows in the inspectors as has Iran.

Oct 31, 2013 9:12am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.