Analysis: In removing stop-and-frisk judge, U.S. court enters rare territory

NEW YORK Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:47pm EDT

Related Topics

Photo

Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

NEW YORK (Reuters) - In a series of interviews in May, U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin said federal judges are too cautious in exercising their creativity and independence.

On Thursday, her own efforts to avoid that pitfall landed her in trouble with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which removed her from a high-profile case involving the New York City Police Department's controversial stop-and-frisk program. Her actions had compromised the appearance of impartiality, the court said.

Such a move is rarely seen from a federal appeals court and signaled that the three judges who wrote the decision were deeply troubled by her actions. But ethics experts said they did not expect Scheindlin to face any formal discipline.

In August, Scheindlin ruled that the stop-and-frisk tactic, in which patrolling officers stop suspicious individuals and search them, had an unconstitutional and disproportionate impact on minorities. She ordered a federal monitor to supervise broad reforms of the department's practices.

In a brief order, the panel found that Scheindlin had "run afoul" of the judicial code of conduct for giving media interviews. The code says judges should not comment on the merits of pending cases.

The court also chastised Scheindlin for encouraging the plaintiffs in the stop-and-frisk case to file a lawsuit and mark it as "related" to another case before her, thus ensuring that she would preside over the case.

Scheindlin's actions ensured that her objectivity could reasonably be questioned, the court concluded.

In a statement, Scheindlin rejected the 2nd Circuit's reasoning, saying she simply instructed the plaintiffs in the case that bringing a "related lawsuit" was the appropriate procedural action.

She also denied that she ever discussed the case in any interview.

"All of the interviews identified by the Second Circuit were conducted under the express condition that I would not comment on the Floyd case," she said. "A careful reading of each interview will reveal that no such comments were made."

Medical student David Floyd was one of the plantiffs in a lawsuit brought by four black and Hispanic men who claimed police improperly targeted them because of their races.

DISCIPLINE IS RARE

There have been a handful of other instances in which appellate courts have cited a judge's conduct in reassigning a case.

Last year, for example, the 3rd Circuit removed U.S. District Judge William Martini in Newark from a pair of criminal cases, including a murder case against former prosecutor Paul Bergrin.

The decisions, which came on the same day but were written by different appeals court panels, found that Martini had wrongly limited the government's prosecution in the Bergrin case and had improperly accused the government of misconduct in a separate case.

Ethics experts said it is extremely rare for judges to face discipline in such cases.

"It is hard enough to discipline a state judge here in New York, but it is rarely used in a federal context," said Ronald Minkoff, a partner at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz and an adjunct professor at Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University.

Under federal rules, the chief judge of the 2nd Circuit would initiate any investigation into an allegation that a judge had engaged in misconduct, whether a formal complaint has been filed or not.

The chief judge then has the discretion to dismiss the claims, conclude that corrective actions have been taken, conclude that intervening events have made a review unnecessary or refer it to a special committee for recommendations, which are then sent to a panel of judges for final determination.

Thursday's order by the 2nd Circuit gave no indication that any such inquiry was in the works.

The 2nd Circuit has not admonished a judge since 2004, when Circuit Judge Guido Calabresi apologized for making comments comparing President George W. Bush's election to the rise of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini.

The chief judge at the time, John Walker, accepted the mea culpa, and in light of the apology a review panel dismissed five complaints against Calabresi.

Scheindlin has clashed with the 2nd Circuit on occasion in other high-profile cases. In 2003, the appeals court overturned her finding that the United States detention of a militant suspect, Osama Awadallah, was illegal.

A jury eventually acquitted Awadallah in 2006.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax and Julia Edwards; Editing by Eddie Evans and Lisa Shumaker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Bighammerman wrote:
So let’s look at all of this. A New York City citizen is not allowed to carry a protective weapon and the police can’t stop and frisk those that are statistically found to carry illegal weapons for criminal purposes. What about the rights of the citizen to protect themselves and their family? Here it is: One is legally allowed to, BARE HANDEDLY, protect themselves and family against ARMED criminals. What kind of logic is this? I think that NYC will have to change laws so law abiding citizens will have the ability to carry a weapon for self protection. Everybody wins except the armed criminal! Let’s ask Bernhard Goetz for an opinion.

Leave the NYPD alone and let them stop and frisk and whatever else they need to do to remove weapons from criminals. I support the NYPD.

Nov 02, 2013 9:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Lleon_Davis wrote:
Why would this judge make common cause with gangbangers? Why would she not be in favor of taking firearms away from people with criminal records? Sure, she tortures the law to make it a case against racism but really, it’s all about her admiration for the thug culture. I have no idea why that is. I just don’t get it. Maybe it’s a Kim or Khloe Kardashian thing.

Nov 02, 2013 9:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
wilhelm wrote:
the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel is over-reaching and showing political bias, not the circuit judge…

Nov 02, 2013 12:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.