Senate panel passes plan to restrict but keep mass surveillance

WASHINGTON Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:28pm EDT

An undated aerial handout photo shows the National Security Agency (NSA) headquarters building in Fort Meade, Maryland. REUTERS/NSA/Handout via Reuters

An undated aerial handout photo shows the National Security Agency (NSA) headquarters building in Fort Meade, Maryland.

Credit: Reuters/NSA/Handout via Reuters

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Senate Intelligence Committee approved legislation on Thursday that would tighten controls on the government's sweeping electronic eavesdropping programs but allow them to continue.

In a classified hearing, the panel voted 11-4 for a measure that puts new limits on what intelligence agencies can do with bulk communications records and imposes a five-year limit on how long they can be retained.

Despite growing national concern about surveillance, the "FISA Improvements Act" would not eliminate programs that became public this year after former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden leaked documents describing how the government collects far more internet and telephone data than previously known.

"The NSA call-records program is legal and subject to extensive congressional and judicial oversight, and I believe it contributes to our national security. But more can and should be done to increase transparency and build public support for privacy protections in place," Senator Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the committee, said in a statement.

If approved by the full Senate and the House and signed by the president, the act would require the special court that oversees the collection programs to designate outside officials to provide independent perspective and assist in reviewing matters that present novel or significant interpretations of the law.

It also requires Senate confirmation of the NSA director and inspector general.

However, the bill ran into immediate opposition from technology companies, civil-liberties groups and another chairman in the majority Democratic Senate.

Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy and Republican Representative James Sensenbrenner this week introduced a bill to end what they termed the government's "dragnet collection" of information.

Sensenbrenner and Leahy, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee which also oversees the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, were the primary authors of the USA Patriot Act implemented after the September 11, 2001, which gave law enforcement and intelligence agencies much more authority.

CODIFY SURVEILLANCE PRACTICES

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden, one of the four intelligence committee members voting against their panel's legislation, said it would codify surveillance practices that are too broad.

"More and more Americans are saying that they refuse to give up their constitutionally guaranteed liberties for the appearance of security; the intelligence committee has passed a bill that ignores this message," Wyden said in a statement.

A critical role in the debate may be played by Google Inc, Facebook Inc, Apple Inc and other big technology companies, which have been whipsawed by intelligence agency collection of their data and the concerns of users, especially those overseas with little protection from U.S. spying.

On Thursday, those three companies, joined by Microsoft Corp, Yahoo Inc and AOL Inc, wrote to Leahy and other members of Congress to "applaud" the contributions of his bill.

They repeated earlier calls that they be allowed to disclose the scope of their cooperation, adding that "our companies believe that government surveillance practices should also be reformed to include substantial enhancements to privacy protections and appropriate oversight and accountability mechanisms."

The tech companies' anger mounted after a report in Wednesday's Washington Post that the NSA had intercepted massive internal transfers of Google and Yahoo data overseas.

In an unusually long response to that report and others this week, the NSA said it must collect information of foreign intelligence value "irrespective of the provider that carries them."

It said it follows "minimization" procedures approved by the attorney general to avoid disseminating data on U.S. residents.

"In addition, NSA is very motivated and actively works to remove as much extraneous data as early in the process possible - to include data of innocent foreign citizens," the agency's public affairs office wrote.

(Reporting by Patricia Zengerle and Joseph Menn.; Editing by Christopher Wilson)

(This story was refiled to fix typo in the subhead)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
edgyinchina wrote:
‘The NSA call-records program is legal and subject to extensive congressional and judicial oversight’…. Says Diane Feinstein… However, WE THE PEOPLE don’t really know if this is true or false. All this is done in SECRET. The meetings are secret, the approvals are secret, the court is secret, the law itself is secret. We can’t even know what exactly the law says, because it’s a secret…. Consequently, there is NO PROOF that any of this is true…. NONE..

Oct 31, 2013 8:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
sharktail wrote:
We are living in Amerika, the beacon of hope and freedom!

Oct 31, 2013 8:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dd606 wrote:
So how many more months is this nonsense going to drag on? I mean, is this seriously the best people have to worry about? I get spoof emails daily, trying to hack my bank accounts. I’ve had three attempts on my PayPal account, this year alone. Most of these efforts come from outside the US, and a good portion of it is state sponsored, or at the very least… the governments of the countries involved, turn a blind eye. But people are outraged, because their phone bill data may or may not be stored in some innocuous server farm somewhere, where it will most-likely never see the light of day, or be viewed by a human being, ever.

So people in other countries making massive efforts to steal all your money… No big deal. Your phone bill info stored on a computer somewhere… End of the world.

People seriously need to check their priorities.

Oct 31, 2013 10:04pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Retirement Road Map