Congo's M23 rebels declare ceasefire but shelling continues

RUNYONI, Democratic Republic of Congo Sun Nov 3, 2013 11:31am EST

Congolese leaders of the M23 rebels are escorted in Bunagana, in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, September 8, 2013. REUTERS/Kenny Katombe

Congolese leaders of the M23 rebels are escorted in Bunagana, in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, September 8, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kenny Katombe

Related Topics

RUNYONI, Democratic Republic of Congo (Reuters) - Congo's M23 rebels declared a ceasefire on Sunday after a string of defeats by government forces, but clashes with the Congolese army continued in the steep, forested hills to where the rebels have withdrawn.

The army has in recent weeks driven rebels from towns they had occupied across eastern Congo, making mediators optimistic for a deal to end the conflict, the most serious since a major Congolese war ended a decade ago.

Uganda, which has led attempts to end the rebellion, has called for both sides to stop fighting. A spokesman for Congo's government called the rebel statement "a step in the right direction" but said it was waiting to see if the ceasefire was implemented on the ground.

"We call on the facilitator of the Kampala peace talks to immediately put in place a mechanism to monitor the ceasefire," the rebels said in statement.

However, a Reuters journalist near the frontline at Runyoni, in North Kivu province, said the two sides were shelling each other's positions on Sunday afternoon.

"With this kind of thing there is always a delay between the order being given and the reality on the ground," said government spokesman Lambert Mende. "In any case the army will continue to pursue the demobilization and disarmament of the rebels."

M23 was launched last year by fighters complaining that the terms of a 2009 peace deal ending a previous rebellion in the mineral-rich east had not been honored.

Last November, the rebels seized Goma, the capital of North Kivu, overrunning government troops and marching past U.N. peacekeepers.

That prompted an overhaul of the army and a strengthening of the U.N. mission's force and mandate. Intense pressure was applied to neighboring Rwanda not to back the rebels, something it denied doing.


Congo's U.N.-backed army made swift gains after it went on the offensive when peace talks broke down 10 days ago.

Rebel fighters this week abandoned Bunagana, their last stronghold in the eastern province, and have withdrawn into the hills and forests around Congo's border with Uganda and Rwanda where the rebellion was launched last year.

Heavy fighting has eased as the rebels pulled back but the army said it shelled rebel positions on Saturday to encourage remaining fighters to surrender.

Colonel Olivier Hamuli, a spokesman for Congo's army, said late on Saturday that the army was slowly advancing and had captured three hilltop positions from the rebels, who were now confined to the hills of Runyoni, Mbuzi and Tshanzu.

Congo's government has dispatched senior negotiators to talks in Uganda but the army is keen to finish off the rebellion, the last in a series of uprisings led by Congolese Tutsis and linked to Rwanda.

In a sign of optimism for an end to violence that has killed millions through conflict and related disease, Russ Feingold, U.S. special envoy for the Great Lakes region of Africa, had said a peace deal could be reached as soon as this weekend.

But writing in South Africa's Sunday Independent newspaper, South African military and defense analyst Helmoed Romer Heitman cautioned that it might be "too early to celebrate" an end to the rebellion.

"Remember that M23 essentially pulled out of positions as (government) forces approached; they were not driven out in combat. Therein may lie a fatal over-optimism," he wrote.

"The key point is that M23 is a guerrilla force and a core tenet of guerrilla war is to side-step a stronger enemy."

Even if a deal is done, deep-rooted issues ranging from ethnic rivalries and conflicts over land and minerals to a weak national government and meddling by more powerful neighbors must be tackled to break the cycles of violence in Congo.

(Additional reporting by Pete Jones in Kinshasa and Pascal Fletcher in Johannesburg; Writing by David Lewis; editing by Robin Pomeroy and Barry Moody)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
PeaceinDRC wrote:
The so called Kampala talks are a farce and insult to the international community intelligence, how can Uganda which is essentially a base for M23 be at the same time the place hosting talks.We keep hearing that there is no military solution to this conflict apparently Kimbumba, Rutshuru,Bunagana,etc have been liberated by force while the so called Kampala talks ongoing for more than a year yielded nothing and are merely used as a stale tactics by Kagame and Museveni to buy time while M23 loot, steal and murder with impunity with goal of taking parts of Congo for Kagame and Museveni.To the Congolese delegation in Kampala be watchful, with despots as Kagame and Museveni you need a strong army in eastern Congo as a deterrent to Kagame and Museveni,the “Kampala talks” are nothing but a farce, be vigilant Congolese delegation

Nov 03, 2013 1:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
oxen wrote:
The rebels on DRC territory must fully disarm. If they flee across the borders to Rwanda and Uganda for safe haven any infiltration with help from those nations should be considered a violation of DRC territory by those states based on Addisababa-Ethiopia agreement.
The Kampala talks are usually calculation talks for the rebellion plotters and hence mostly jokes that go no where to bring peace. A better facilitation was needs. But is is great the UN/SADC have chased the rebels out of controlling the DRC Kivu’s to stop them causing anarchy there

Nov 03, 2013 2:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.