Israel, Palestinians grim on peace talks before Kerry visit

JERUSALEM Tue Nov 5, 2013 7:49am EST

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem November 3, 2013. REUTERS/Baz Ratner

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem November 3, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Baz Ratner

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israeli and Palestinian officials said on Tuesday the three-month-old peace talks pressed on them by Washington are going nowhere, painting a grim picture for a visit this week by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry.

Few details have emerged from negotiating sessions held at unannounced times and at secret locations in line with pledges to keep a lid on leaks.

But both sides have been airing their frustration over a lack of progress in the U.S.-brokered talks aimed at resolving core issues such as the borders of a Palestinian state, security arrangements, the future of Israeli settlements in occupied territory and the fate of Palestinian refugees.

"The Palestinians are not conducting the talks in good faith," Gideon Saar, the Israeli interior minister who is close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, told Army Radio. "(The Palestinians) are locked in their positions and are showing no flexibility on their starting positions."

In a speech broadcast on Monday, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said: "After all the rounds of negotiations there is nothing on the ground."

With both sides already trading blame over the absence of any sign of movement in the negotiations, Kerry will hold separate meetings on Wednesday with Netanyahu and Abbas.

On the sidelines of the peace talks, Israel has released half of the 104 Palestinian prisoners it pledged to free under a deal Kerry brokered to draw Abbas back to negotiations after a three-year break over Israeli settlement-building.

Israel says continued housing construction in settlements, in areas it intends to keep in any peace accord, was part of those understandings, which led to the return home of long-serving Palestinian inmates convicted of killing Israelis.

In tandem with the release of 26 men last week, Israel pressed ahead with plans to build 3,500 more settler homes in the West Bank, a move widely seen as an attempt by Netanyahu to placate hardliners in his government.

Nabil Abu Rdeineh, an Abbas spokesman, condemned the settlement campaign but said Palestinians remained committed to the negotiations.

"What's required is a firm American position on Israel's provocations. Israel is continuing its policy of putting obstacles in front of the peace process - every time Kerry comes to the region they announce more settlements."


Netanyahu accused the Palestinians of reneging on what he said was an agreed prisoners-settlements link.

"If they can't even ... stand beside and behind the agreements that we had, that we release prisoners but we continue building, then how can I see that they'll actually stand by the larger issues?" he said in an interview with the Israel-based i24 television news channel.

Abbas, speaking to his Fatah party on Sunday, voiced opposition to any such linkage, cautioning that "this equation could blow up the talks" and "there could be tensions soon".

The settlements that Israel has built in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are considered illegal by most countries. Israel cites historical and biblical links to the areas, where about 500,000 Israelis now live alongside 2.5 million Palestinians.

Israeli media on Monday reported that Kerry, who has given the sides nine months to reach a deal, plans in January to introduce a peace proposal if no major progress is made.

At a news conference in Riyadh on Monday, Kerry said there was no such plan "at this point in time". He has spoken publicly of possible U.S. bridging proposals if no major progress is made.

(Additional reporting by Ali Sawafta and Noah Browning in Ramallah and Lesley Wroughton, editing by Jeffrey Heller and Mark Heinrich)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (12)
Link Israel’s aid to progress. No progress, no money.

Nov 05, 2013 8:52am EST  --  Report as abuse
rgbviews wrote:
“The Palestinians are not conducting the talks in good faith,” ………. “(The Palestinians) are locked in their positions and are showing no flexibility on their starting positions.”

So the Palestinians are showing no flexibility. They keep referring to international law which makes the 67 boundary the starting point. The same starting point recommended by Mr. Obama many months ago. The same starting point expected by the UN. The same starting point expected by the EU and most civilized nations around the globe.

The Israelis, on the other hand, are being flexible. With the Palestinians and the Arab League having already agreed to full recognition of the State of Israel, the Israelis now demand recognition of the “Jewish State of Israel”, knowing this to be totally unacceptable to the Palestinian citizens of Israel and the Palestinian refugees worldwide. With the Palestinians willing to share Jerusalem the Israeli government unilaterally declares that all of Jerusalem will become part of Israel in any agreement, knowing that the Palestinians will never abandon their most holy site. With the Palestinian leadership willing to abandon its boycott of negotiations due to continued settlement building in the face of tremendous political backlash, and both parties agreeing not to do anything that would disrupt the peace talks, the Israelis announce plans for 3500 more settlement homes.

Kerry and Obama have been played as fools by Netanyahu. It’s time for the UN Quartet to dictate to Israel.

Nov 05, 2013 10:04am EST  --  Report as abuse
PcGuy12345 wrote:
Can you elaborate on what is this international law that says ’67 borders should be the starting point of negotiations. ’67 borders were just armistice lines from 1948-49 war, a war which Arab countries started to try to wipe out Israel at its birth. Where’s the international law that says those lines should be the starting point ? A link to a UN resolution stating this would be very helpful. Thank you.

Nov 05, 2013 11:27am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.