Florida city reverses gun ban on neighborhood watch volunteers

ORLANDO, Florida Wed Nov 6, 2013 5:58pm EST

George Zimmerman testifies from the stand before Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester Jr. at the Seminole County Courthouse in Sanford, Florida, April 20, 2012 for a bond hearing on second degree murder charges in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin. REUTERS/Gary W. Green/POOL

George Zimmerman testifies from the stand before Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester Jr. at the Seminole County Courthouse in Sanford, Florida, April 20, 2012 for a bond hearing on second degree murder charges in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.

Credit: Reuters/Gary W. Green/POOL

Related Topics

ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - Police in the Florida city where George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin have backed off a plan to explicitly ban neighborhood watch volunteers from carrying guns while on duty.

Earlier this month, police in Sanford, Florida, announced new rules on how civilian patrols can operate in an attempt to revive the program's reputation.

Sanford was thrust in the national spotlight last year when Zimmerman, a former neighborhood watch captain, gunned down Martin, an unarmed black teenager. Prosecutors accused Zimmerman of chasing down and killing Martin, but a jury acquitted him in July of murder.

Sanford Police Chief Cecil Smith, in a phone interview on Wednesday, refused repeated requests to explain the reversal.

"That was the choice of the chief. That was my decision," Smith said. "What my thought is is unimportant."

Smith introduced the new rules and a new handbook for the town's neighborhood watch program at a community meeting on Tuesday.

Last week, his spokesman told Reuters the new rules would explicitly state that residents acting under the authority of neighborhood watch may not carry a firearm or pursue someone they deem suspicious.

The Orlando Sentinel newspaper reported the ban upset gun advocates, but Smith told Reuters he felt no pressure to make the change.

Neighborhood watch consists of residents who volunteer to be the eyes and ears of police in their neighborhoods, and simply report to police any suspicious activity.

"We are strongly suggesting, strongly recommending, strongly urging people not to be armed in the performance of neighborhood watch," Smith said.

Neighborhood watch programs, formally organized in 1972 under the National Sheriffs' Association, began in reaction to the notorious 1964 murder of Catherine Susan "Kitty" Genovese.

Her cries for help during an attack outside her Queens apartment reportedly were ignored by neighbors, one of whom was famously quoted as saying she did not want to get involved.

Today's neighborhood groups often are untrained and unsupervised by police, vary in their dedication to the job, and remain unregistered with either the sheriffs' association or local police agencies.

(Editing by Kevin Gray and Richard Chang)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
JamVee wrote:
I don’t think you can legally ban a citizen volunteer from “carrying”, if it is otherwise legal (laws, permits, etc.) in that location. However it would be highly unwise for them to ever use the weapon during their neighborhood watch activities, for any situation except purely in SELF DEFENSE, and even then, only if its a LIFE THREATENING situation.

Nov 06, 2013 6:23pm EST  --  Report as abuse
daedilus wrote:
I’ll explain it.

Neighborhood watch volunteers are citizens.

Citizens have the right to keep and bear arms.

If you tell them they can’t, you are infringing their rights.

They were threatened with a lawsuit by a pro gun organization, their lawyers told them they would lose, and they reversed their misguided stupidity.

Nov 07, 2013 10:33am EST  --  Report as abuse
jimmy37 wrote:
“. . . Zimmerman, a former neighborhood watch captain, gunned down Martin, an unarmed black teenager. Prosecutors accused Zimmerman of chasing down and killing Martin . . .”

A STINKING LIE.
YOU CALL THIS JOURNALISM??

Martin was not “chased down”. Martin was not “gunned down”.

Martin CHOSE to punch Zimmerman in the face and knock Zimmerman down.
Martin CHOSE to get atop of Zimmerman and tried to murder Zimmerman by banging his head into the concrete.

Martin was justly shot by Zimmerman.
Martin had plenty of chances to walk away. Zimmerman never touched him.

Nov 07, 2013 11:23am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.