Washington state Senate passes tax breaks, aiming to win Boeing work

OLYMPIA, Washington Sat Nov 9, 2013 5:21pm EST

A visitor takes a picture of miniature Boeing passenger aircraft on display at Aviation Expo China 2013 in Beijing September 25, 2013. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon

A visitor takes a picture of miniature Boeing passenger aircraft on display at Aviation Expo China 2013 in Beijing September 25, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kim Kyung-Hoon

U.S. Secret Service provide security for President Barack Obama in Pensacola, Florida, June 15, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young

Protecting the President

The Secret Service detail surrounding President Obama.  Slideshow 

OLYMPIA, Washington (Reuters) - The Washington state Senate on Saturday passed a measure to extend nearly $9 billion in tax breaks for Boeing through 2040 in an embattled effort to entice the company to locate production of its newest jet, the 777X, in the Seattle area.

Lawmakers acknowledged, however, that their efforts would likely be undermined if the airplane maker's key machinists union votes down a proposed labor contract due to go to before the membership on Wednesday.

A contract locking in Boeing's labor costs, along with the tax incentives, is key to state officials' plan to keep the 777X production local. Boeing has said that barring a "yes" vote on the contract, it would be looking at other potential locations.

The tax measure passed the Senate by a vote of 42 to 2.

"Our vote isn't near as important as theirs," said Democratic state Senator Brian Hatfield of Raymond, Washington, said of the union vote.

"It's a big deal," he added. "It is your job and your family and your pension, but it also has lots to do with the future of the state."

Along with a bill to commit more state funds to aerospace worker training programs, the tax incentives bill headed to the Washington state House, which was expected to act later in the day.

Boeing's latest jet - the 777X, a successor to its most profitable long-haul aircraft - would secure tens of thousands of jobs in the Seattle area, which is competing with non-unionized workers in the U.S. South, where wages are lower.

Earlier this week, it appeared Boeing had little leverage over the legislature because building the jet next to the current 777 assembly would lead to cost savings and limiting risks associated with locating the work elsewhere.

Leaders of the International Association of Machinists stood alongside Governor Jay Inslee when he announced his tax and labor plans for Boeing.

But at a raucous union meeting Thursday night, IAM President Tom Wroblewski tore up the proposed contract and called it "a piece of crap."

Hours later Boeing said it was ready to look for another location.

Protest against the proposed contract continued on Friday, as union members rallied in Boeing's Everett factory.

Analysts reacted cautiously to the union opposition, saying a deal could still be reached, despite the heated rhetoric.

Boeing and IAM union leaders reached a tentative deal after confidential and exclusive talks that were first reported by Reuters.

The deal calls for lower healthcare benefits and a new retirement plan, and a separate draft agreement with state officials would provide for tax and other incentives.

The vote by 31,000 members is scheduled to go ahead on Wednesday, and there are no scheduled talks with Boeing about a different offer, said Jonathan Battaglia, a union spokesman.

Industry experts say Washington faces competition from states including South Carolina, where Boeing assembles some of its 787 Dreamliners, as well as Texas and Utah.

Japan, whose heavy industry builds wings for the Dreamliner, is seen as a contender to build the wings for the 777X, the longest wings designed for a Boeing jetliner.

The new standoff comes as Boeing prepares to launch the 777X with potentially record orders at the Dubai Airshow. But the discord is not expected to derail those plans, industry sources said.

The head of European airline group IAG said on Friday it was interested in the 777X for Iberia and British Airways.

(Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Nick Zieminski)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
Rich_F wrote:
you’ve been seeing smaller/different industries escaping the high cost blue states for a while now so this move is nothing new. once again the unions will cut their own throats and boeing will leave for cheaper pastures and another blue state will head down the road of detroit.

Nov 09, 2013 5:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
jamesshank wrote:
Maybe if boeing would have had union work with the dreamliner, they wouldn’t have to pay so much to fix their battery problem. I hope Rich _F doesn’t choke on his next break that was provided by unions.

Nov 09, 2013 5:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SeniorMoment wrote:
The union should turn down the contract because it takes back benefits and it should hold Boeing to its prior pension commitments by placing liens on Boeing assets before Boeing can relocate them. The value of the real estate alone is substantial. The state government already had lowered Boeing other employment related taxes and it pays a business and occupational tax almost as low as agriculture.

As a Washington state resident I say to hell with Boeing if it is not going to contribute its fair share of state and local taxes. Training aerospace engineers and the other skilled workers is not a low cost enterprise at the state universities and colleges, and none of the Southern states offer equivalently educated workers.

It is not like Boeing can afford to rebuild all of its facilities in the Seattle area. It has moved some important development staff to California because it can reuse facilities it owns there and has space to build full scale models of almost any future model including potential spacecraft. The phasing out of the

It is past time to end the downward spiral of living standards in the USA. U. S. Corporations have given back to investors and regular employees almost nothing of the productivity gains realized in the last 25 years. Median household income this year was lower after subtracting inflation than it was 25 years ago and that is a downward spiral for the entire nation because 70% of our economy is consumer spending.

Nov 09, 2013 6:30pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Retirement Road Map