White House urges Congress to regain U.S. UNESCO vote

WASHINGTON Sat Nov 9, 2013 3:33pm EST

U.S. National Security Advisor Susan Rice looks up during a meeting between U.S. President Barack Obama (R) and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the G20 Summit in St. Petersburg, Russia September 5, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. National Security Advisor Susan Rice looks up during a meeting between U.S. President Barack Obama (R) and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the G20 Summit in St. Petersburg, Russia September 5, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - White House national security adviser Susan Rice on Saturday urged Congress to allow the United States to regain its vote at the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, which it lost for not paying dues.

"Shameful that US has lost its vote at #UNESCO," Rice wrote on Twitter. "Congress needs to fix this. Current law doesn't punish the Palestinians; it handicaps the US."

UNESCO on Friday suspended the voting rights of the United States and Israel, two years after both countries stopped paying dues to the U.N. cultural arm to protest its granting full membership to the Palestinians.

The U.S. decision to cancel its funding in October 2011 was blamed on American laws that prohibit funding to any U.N. agency that implies recognition of the Palestinians' demands for their own state.

The withdrawal of U.S. funding - which totaled about $240 million, or some 22 percent of UNESCO's budget - has plunged it into a funding crisis and forced it to cut programs.

UNESCO is responsible for designating World Heritage sites, promoting global education and supporting press freedom, among other tasks.

Analysts have said that by losing its vote, the United States is foregoing and important opportunity to exercise "soft power" - the ability to exert international influence through other means than brute force or money. That gap is likely to be filled by other emerging global powers, such as China, they say.

"UNESCO directly advances U.S. interests in supporting girls' and women's education, facilitating important scientific research, promoting tolerance, protecting and preserving the world's natural and cultural heritage, supporting freedom of the press, and much more," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said on Friday.

It is not the first time the United States has been at odds with UNESCO.

Washington withdrew from the agency in 1984, complaining of wasteful bureaucracy and a Third World bias.

Under the leadership of Senegal's Amadou Mbow, UNESCO promoted a controversial "new world information order" that the Western press saw as a bid to muzzle it.

The administration of U.S. President Ronald Reagan accused it of serving as a forum for Third World criticism of the United States and Israel.

The United States rejoined the agency in 2002 under President George W. Bush, who said it had undertaken needed reforms.

(Reporting By Mark Felsenthal)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
tbro wrote:
And the world’s UN community would do that why, ’cause we’ve made such great strides in warm relations with them all, with our wars and spying on everyone?

Nov 09, 2013 4:20pm EST  --  Report as abuse
rgbviews wrote:
“The U.S. decision to cancel its funding …….. to any U.N. agency that implies recognition of the Palestinians’ demands for their own state.”

Hellooooo! ….USA …..anybody home?
The State of Palestine now exists, as confirmed many months ago by an overwhelming vote at the UNGA.

The US acts like an immature teenager. Johnny does like the referee’s decisions so he’s going to take his ball and go home.

Nov 09, 2013 5:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
rgbviews wrote:
Well it took some time for the US to publicly display one of the negative effects of AIPAC influence in Congress. Will Congress start putting US interests ahead of Israeli interests? Let’s hope so!

Nov 09, 2013 5:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.