JPMorgan Chase agrees to pay $4.5 billion on mortgage security claims

NEW YORK Fri Nov 15, 2013 6:36pm EST

People walk inside JP Morgan headquarters in New York, October 25, 2013. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

People walk inside JP Morgan headquarters in New York, October 25, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Eduardo Munoz

NEW YORK (Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase & Co said on Friday it has agreed to pay $4.5 billion to settle claims by investors who lost money on mortgage-backed securities before the collapse of the U.S. housing market.

The bank reached the agreement with 21 institutional investors in 330 residential mortgage-backed securities trusts issued by JPMorgan and Bear Stearns, which it took over during the financial crisis, according to the bank and lawyers for the investors.

The deal still has to be accepted by seven trustees overseeing the securities holdings, the parties said.

The settlement does not include trusts issued by Washington Mutual, which JPMorgan also acquired.

The deal is separate from the preliminary $13 billion settlement JPMorgan has reached with the U.S. government that would resolve a raft of actions over mortgage-backed securities.

"This settlement is another important step in J.P. Morgan's efforts to resolve legacy related RMBS matters," the bank said in a statement. The bank said it believes reserves it has built will cover the expense of "this and any remaining" mortgage securities litigation.

The 21 investors include BlackRock Inc, Metlife Inc, Allianz SE's Pacific Investment Management Company, the TCW Group and Bayerische Landesbank.

Under the agreement, trustees have until January 15 to accept the offer, which may be extended for another 60 days, according to JPMorgan and Gibbs & Bruns, the Houston law firm that represented the institutional investors.

Kathy Patrick of Gibbs & Bruns called the deal "an important milestone" in a three-year effort by the group of 21 bondholders.

The seven trustees over the bonds include Bank of New York Mellon Corp. Kevin Heine, a spokesman for the Bank of New York Mellon, said the bank would "evaluate the proposed settlement along with the other trustees."

If accepted, the deal would resolve claims that JPMorgan and Bear Stearns misrepresented the mortgages underlying the securities, JPMorgan said.

The settlement also would resolve servicing claims on all trusts issued by the bank and Bear Stearns between 2005 and 2008.

JPMorgan is the third bank to strike a deal with investors over shoddy mortgage-backed securities issued in the run-up to the financial crisis.

Bank of America Corp struck an $8.5 billion settlement in June 2011 with 22 institutional investors. That deal is still awaiting court approval.

In 2012, bondholders in trusts issued by Ally Financial's bankrupt former mortgage lending arm, Residential Capital, won an agreement to bring an $8.7 billion claim, although that was later reduced to $7.3 billion.

Gibbs & Bruns has represented investors in all three settlements. In 2011, the law firm said its investor clients had instructed trustees overseeing $95 billion of securities issued by JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual to investigate whether the bonds were backed by ineligible mortgages.

Washington Mutual is not included in the deal because of ongoing litigation between the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and JPMorgan over who is responsible for losses at the former mortgage lender, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The separate tentative $13 billion settlement between JPMorgan and the U.S. government also has been complicated by that dispute, according to other sources.

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has vowed to resolve legal and regulatory issues that have been weighing heavily on the company since May 2012.

In October, JPMorgan reported its first quarterly loss under Dimon as it recorded more than $9 billion of expenses to build its litigation reserves.

JPMorgan is the biggest U.S. bank by assets.

(Reporting by Karen Freifeld. Additional reporting by David Henry in New York.; Editing by Gary Hill and David Gregorio)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
divinargant wrote:
Not enough. Make it a $100b offer and maybe we can negotiate around that amount. Go back Jamie and check your books.

Nov 15, 2013 5:21pm EST  --  Report as abuse
FredF99 wrote:
What about making an offer to all the small investors they sold dud CDO’s too?

Nov 15, 2013 7:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
CharlesReed wrote:
What about the 1.3 million government insured loans Wells Fargo was servicing of Washington Mutual Bank at the time of the bank being seized by the FDIC. So did these 1.3 million loans go up in smoke? No as Wells Fargo is pretending as if they were the lender and is illegally foreclosing these loans!

These loans would not be purchased by JPMorgan because Ginnie Mae was involved and was in possession of the Notes, but did not purchase the debt.

The problem is huge as whether it was a foreclosure or a refinancing of the debt, it could not have been authorized because Ginnie Mae hold the Notes but not the debt, and cannot prove it own the debt. Game over!

Nov 15, 2013 7:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.