Senate inches toward Fannie, Freddie reform but deal elusive

WASHINGTON Fri Nov 15, 2013 7:04pm EST

The Fannie Mae headquarters is seen in Washington November 7, 2013. REUTERS/Gary Cameron

The Fannie Mae headquarters is seen in Washington November 7, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Gary Cameron

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The leaders of the Senate Banking Committee appear unlikely to meet their goal of producing a bill by year-end that would wind down major mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB) and Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB), given the shrinking timeline and the tricky politics.

Conservative Republicans favor shutting down the government-run firms and placing control of the nearly $10 trillion housing finance system firmly in the private sector's hand.

But liberal Democrats worry that less affluent Americans will lose access to mortgages even if a limited government role is retained, unless there are safeguards to ensure the availability of credit for all borrowers.

Committee Chairman Tim Johnson and Senator Mike Crapo, the panel's top Republican, have been working together closely to bridge the partisan divide.

Crapo has agreed that some sort of government backstop for the mortgage market, which loan guarantors Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac now dominate, should be retained - a fact analysts see as a political breakthrough.

"The committee is being proactive, but the big question will wind up being - what price does Senator Crapo want to extract for giving support to a federal guarantee?" said Brandon Barford, a former Republican aide to the committee who is now a vice president at ACG Analytics, an investment research firm.

The goal is to craft a system that provides continued access to long-term, fixed-rate mortgages, while limiting the risk taxpayers will ever face losses.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which buy mortgages from lenders and repackage them into securities for investors, were bailed out to the tune of $188 billion after the government seized them in 2008 as defaulting loans threatened their solvency.

But threading the needle between centrist lawmakers, liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans is proving difficult, even with the Obama administration's heavy involvement.

And while the Democratic and Republican leaders of the committee are still talking, and staff are working to flesh out details, some Senate aides said a draft bill will not be ready for the panel's consideration until 2014. An agreement in principal, however, is likely, according to sources.

STARTING POINT ON LONG PROCESS

Johnson, who has overseen a flurry of hearings on housing reform in recent weeks, said he has worked closely with Crapo to increase the odds of reaching a deal that can secure enough bipartisan votes to win full Senate approval.

"Because of our inclusive, deliberative process, we have more buy-in on the importance of reform from members on both sides of the aisle, the administration, and those in the housing industry as well as housing advocates," the South Dakota Democrat told Reuters.

"I remain hopeful that Ranking Member Crapo and I can reach agreement on legislation that is workable and will improve the stability of the housing market," he said.

Barford said that Crapo's demand for signing off on some sort of government mortgage guarantee, even one that might only kick in during catastrophic situations, "will be very strict underwriting standards to protect taxpayers."

Johnson and Crapo are building on a bipartisan bill crafted by Republican Senator Bob Corker and Democratic Senator Mark Warner.

That proposal would wind down Fannie and Freddie and replace them with a new government reinsurer. It would mandate private financiers to hold a stake and take at least 10 percent of the first losses on mortgage debt. The government would only provide assistance after private creditors had taken a hit.

By including a government guarantee in the overhaul plan, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are conceding that a federal backstop is necessary to keep the cost of mortgage financing low and access to credit widely available.

But left-leaning groups still worry the pendulum will swing too far and say ensuring broad access to mortgages is essential.

"If we're going to have the votes to move to a new housing finance system, any new reform measure will have to replicate Fannie and Freddie's mission to serve all markets," said Julia Gordon, director for housing finance and policy at the Center for American Progress.

"Legislation will fail to make it out of the committee process unless lawmakers beef up the proposal to ensure it serves all players in the (housing) market equitably," she said.

Even if their draft does not make it to the Senate floor, anything Johnson and Crapo produce will be a starting point for whatever Congress may eventually approve.

Any housing reform plan passed by the Democratic-controlled Senate must also make its way through the Republican-controlled House before it could be signed into law.

Industry experts and political analysts do not expect that to happen before the mid-term elections in November 2014, and probably not until after the next presidential election in 2016.

(Reporting by Margaret Chadbourn; Editing by Tim Ahmann and Andrea Ricci)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
CharlesReed wrote:
Don’t forget that Ginnie Mae is screwed up and is a $1.1 trillion ponzi scheme waiting to blow up, because it has absolutely no underlying collateral supporting it!

Nov 15, 2013 10:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
nose2066 wrote:
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now making money and sending big dividend payments to the Treasury. These institutions are in the “too big to fail category”. In fact, the business of lending mortgage money is essential to reviving the economy every time that the economy goes into recession. In the next recssion, government would just need to do something special with the mortgage market again.

They ain’t broke now, why do these two companies need to be fixed?

Nov 16, 2013 7:59am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.