Forget data and rhetoric, Fed liquidity's the only show in town

LONDON Sun Nov 17, 2013 8:27am EST

The sun rises to the east of the U.S. Federal Reserve building in Washington, July 31, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

The sun rises to the east of the U.S. Federal Reserve building in Washington, July 31, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

LONDON (Reuters) - For all the fevered speculation about when the Federal Reserve will begin scaling back its monetary stimulus, market volatility has been taking a leisurely nap, suggesting investors see no major shocks on the horizon to derail their bets.

Low market volatility is a sign markets expect no "taper" any time soon, or that they are steeled for a reduction in the pace of the Fed's bond-buying if it comes.

The sting of the taper has been gradually sucked out of markets since the Fed's surprise decision not to start withdrawing stimulus in September.

Since then, implied volatility in U.S. Treasuries, stocks and key dollar exchange rates has sunk close to its lowest in months, or in some cases years.

This might come as a surprise, given the noise surrounding the latest relatively upbeat U.S. employment and economic growth figures and the keenly awaited congressional testimony from Fed Chair-elect Janet Yellen last Thursday.

But the Fed's $85 billion-a-month asset purchase program trumps everything, and as long as the liquidity taps are open, the economic data will only have a real impact on markets if it changes the Fed's thinking.

"We're not trying to follow the twists and turns of the very short-term investment cycle," said Kevin Gardiner, head of global investment strategy at Barclays Wealth in London.

The same goes for data or Fed commentary, he said. Only if they "dramatically changed" the Fed's policy outlook would he consider altering his strategy.

Market pricing and indicators suggest he's not alone. Wall Street last week posted record highs on an almost daily basis, and the S&P 500 .SPX and Dow Jones Industrials .DJI have risen for six consecutive weeks.

This has been fuelled by a collapse in volatility from the unusually high levels around the U.S. debt ceiling and government shutdown crisis in early October. The VIX index .VIX of implied volatility for the S&P 500 fell to a three-month low on Thursday.

It's a similar story in the U.S. bond market. The 'Mermove' index .MERMOVE3M of three-month implied volatility on Treasuries has almost halved since early September.


The following chart shows that since mid-2011, the correlation between U.S. economic surprises and two-year Treasury yields has completely broken down:

The ebb and flow of data surprises - both positive and negative - has had virtually no bearing on yields, which have remained at historic lows thanks to the trillions of dollars of liquidity and zero interest rates from the Fed.

Currency traders are even more sanguine. One-month implied volatility on the euro/dollar exchange rate posted its lowest daily close on Thursday since 2007.

"The foreign exchange market is digesting signs that the period of peak liquidity will remain in place for the foreseeable future," Brown Brothers Harriman said in a note on Friday.

At her nomination hearing on Capitol Hill On Thursday, Yellen said it was "imperative" that the Fed did all it could to promote a "very strong recovery".

That wouldn't have surprised anyone. But what might have raised a few eyebrows was her assertion that she wouldn't rule out using monetary policy to address asset price "misalignments", otherwise known as "bubbles".

This marked a departure from former Fed chief Alan Greenspan and current incumbent Ben Bernanke. Both said it was virtually impossible to detect bubbles in asset markets and was not the Fed's business to deal with them.

But tightening monetary policy to cool asset markets is less likely than tightening to meet the Fed's mandate on employment or inflation, which remain well short of the stated goals.

In that light, the taper, when it comes, will be a "slow, careful withdrawal of stimulus", reckons Bank of America-Merrill Lynch, forecasting another 10 percent rise in the S&P 500 over the next 12 months even as the Fed exits.

"Fear not the Fed," said the bank's U.S. economist Ethan Harris.

(Editing by Will Waterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
highlandlad wrote:
So, the Grand Wizard to be believes that she can foretell the future. And the markets believe her. She said that the monetary expansion cannot go on forever. Forever is a very long time indeed; the present rate of monetary expansion could go on for a very long time, but not forever. And what is to stop the Grand Wizard to be and her cohort from continuing the monetary expansion at the present rate? Not the U.S. Congress, for sure. Not the lack of borrowing on easy terms by the U.S. Government, for there is no end in sight for the government’s spending deficit — it is forecast to increase once Obamacare subsidies ramp up, as they will. With the Federal Reserve buying the Treasury’s bills without end, and Congress allowing the government’s indebtedness to expand without limit (save for a hickup or two between reauthorizations), the U.S. dollar will in time be used for wall-paper it will be so plentiful.

Nov 17, 2013 9:42am EST  --  Report as abuse
Afrodo wrote:
Forget Data……..And Rhetoric, So-far, The Fed Owns….. 1/2 Of The Town, called USA.

Nov 17, 2013 11:27am EST  --  Report as abuse
The Fed seems absolutely clueless that our currency (note I did NOT say “money”) is backed only by the “full faith and credit” of the US government. The day will come sooner than later when those who hold our debt will demand a higher return for their diluted dollars, and that will mark the end of the Fed being able to print without hyperinflation.

The problem is that they’ll HAVE to print, since we’re running such a huge deficit that balancing the budget is politically impossible, and balancing it with treasury rates significantly higher will be financially impossible without massive printing, which will further spur higher rates, more printing, lather, rinse, repeat. Zimbabwe and the Weimar republic show us just how bad it will get.

The only silver lining is that when the crash comes, we might finally be able to rid ourselves of a central bank, end fractional reserve currency, and get back to honest money again.

The dollar will actually make better toilet paper than wallpaper, and that’s a better symbolic use of it. Besides, a dollar bill will be much cheaper than an equivalent amount of toilet paper in the future!

Nov 19, 2013 10:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.