U.S. justices won't review intelligence court action on phone records

WASHINGTON Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:47pm EST

A Verizon wireless store is shown in Del Mar, California June 6, 2013. REUTERS/Mike Blake

A Verizon wireless store is shown in Del Mar, California June 6, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Blake

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday it would not review a ruling by the secretive intelligence court that gave the government access to records kept by Verizon Communications Inc on millions of telephone calls.

The long-shot case was brought to the high court by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), a public interest research organization. It was the first time the high-profile issue has come before the justices since former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden began in June to leak secret documents detailing American surveillance programs.

The NSA used records like those provided by Verizon as part of the spy agency's counterterrorism surveillance activities.

The court rejected the case in a one-sentence order.

The Obama administration argued in papers presented to the court that under existing law, only the U.S. government or Verizon itself could challenge a ruling by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Marc Rotenberg, EPIC's president, said in a statement that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act makes it difficult to challenge the intelligence court's decisions.

"The surveillance order was clearly unlawful," he said.

The intelligence court's activities received widespread public attention in June when the British-based Guardian newspaper published the order that gave permission for the U.S. government to access data of telecommunications giant Verizon.

Snowden is in Russia, where he was granted asylum in August for at least a year. He faces criminal charges in the United States stemming from his disclosures.

The Supreme Court case is unrelated to several other challenges to the same program, including one pursued by the American Civil Liberties Union in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

A hearing in that case is scheduled for Friday.

ACLU attorney Alex Abdo said the Supreme Court's action in the EPIC case had little bearing on the ongoing litigation in lower courts, where judges "will have to grapple with the merits of the NSA's call-tracking program."

EPIC's petition bypassed the usual appeals process, which is why it came before the Supreme Court so quickly.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment.

The case is In re: Electronic Privacy Information Center, U.S. Supreme Court, 13-58.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Howard Goller and Will Dunham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
WhyMeLord wrote:
Our flawed Supreme Court has abandoned simple hustice long ago.
In a futile effort to uphold the law and satisfy “Big Broter” and his evil ilk, the Supreme Court has failed all of us miserably.
Justice should prevail no matter who files the case; this is wrong. Instead of being sages, they’re stooges, and should step down before they fall down. Those who puts their life and liberty into the hands of these “do gooders” places themselves at considerable risk.

Nov 18, 2013 12:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.