Afghans say deal agreed with U.S. for Obama to acknowledge war 'mistakes'

KABUL Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:08pm EST

U.S. troops stop a man to search him while on patrol near Command Outpost AJK (short for Azim-Jan-Kariz, a nearby village) in Maiwand District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan, February 1, 2013. REUTERS/Andrew Burton

U.S. troops stop a man to search him while on patrol near Command Outpost AJK (short for Azim-Jan-Kariz, a nearby village) in Maiwand District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan, February 1, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Burton

Related Topics

KABUL (Reuters) - The Afghan government said on Tuesday it had reached a deal on the framework of a security pact with the United States after receiving assurances that President Barack Obama would issue a letter acknowledging U.S. mistakes made during the 12-year war.

But despite the Afghan announcement, the Obama administration did not confirm that it had agreed to such a letter, which could draw criticism from Republicans and anger U.S. veterans of the war.

And the State Department said some issues between the sides still had to be resolved before a final deal was reached with Afghanistan that would allow U.S. troops to stay there beyond 2014.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, in a phone call on Tuesday, overcame the main stumbling blocks to an agreement that will be put before the Loya Jirga, an assembly of Afghan tribal and political leaders due to meet in Kabul on Thursday, Karzai's spokesman said.

Without an accord on the so-called Bilateral Security Agreement, the United States has warned that it could pull out all its troops at the end of next year and leave Afghan forces to fight alone against a resilient Taliban-led insurgency.

Two years ago, Washington ended its military mission in Iraq with a similar "zero option" outcome that lead to the withdrawal of all of its troops after the failure of talks with Baghdad.

Aimal Faizi, Karzai's spokesman, said the two sides agreed on crucial provisions giving U.S. troops immunity from Afghan law and allowing them to enter Afghan homes in exceptional circumstances, something the Afghan president had resisted.

Faizi said the accord - which must now be approved by the Loya Jirga - was partly due to a promise that Obama would give a written admission of U.S. military errors in a war that has claimed many civilian casualties in addition to combatants.

RIGHT TO ENTER AFGHAN HOMES

"Both sides agreed that Obama send a letter ... assuring the president and the people of Afghanistan that the right to enter into Afghan homes by U.S. forces and the extraordinary circumstances will not be misused," Faizi told reporters in Kabul.

"The whole idea of having a letter was to acknowledge the suffering of the Afghan people and the mistakes of the past. That was the only thing that satisfied the president," Faizi added.

Asked whether a letter of that nature would be issued, White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters: "I don't have any specifics on any language of a letter that hasn't been written."

A senior State Department official said Kerry told Karzai that "we will consider his request for reassurances including the option of a letter from the administration stating our position."

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a frequent critic of Obama's foreign policy, said: "I'm stunned. Apologize for what?"

"Maybe we should get the Afghan president to apologize to the American soldiers for all the hardship he's created for them," Graham told Reuters. "And maybe President Karzai should apologize to the Afghan people for poor leadership and corruption."

Karzai had long objected to a security pact that gives U.S. forces the authority to raid Afghan homes and granting immunity from Afghan prosecution, but Washington has said such provisions are crucial for its troops to remain in the country beyond 2014 when most foreign troops are due to leave.

(Additional reporting by Dylan Welch, Matt Spetalnick, Lesley Wrougton, Mirwais Harooni, Patricia Zengerle and Adrian Croft; Writing by Dylan Welch; Editing by Maria Golovnina, Ralph Boulton and Philip Barbara)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
mils54 wrote:
Don’t know if the U.S wanting to maintain troops and bases in Afghanistan actually has much to do with the host country ?, Again the U.S will be using millions upon millions of tax payer dollars to have military capability for another unstable Government, And that is Pakistan. Not fact, Just my opinion.

Nov 19, 2013 4:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Well, it’s not like Afghanistan is in any position to bargain here. The U.S. is leaving. Gone. Done with that turd-circus. What is Afghanistan going to say: “No, that is unacceptable to us.”

Nov 19, 2013 5:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
ReverendJim wrote:
I am not a wilting flower on the conflict in Afghanistan, but with recent revelations of our intelligence agencies misusing their “borderline” powers to snoop on Americans, how can we expect the people of Afghanistan to feel confident we wont “Miss use” our powers there? I don’t cry at civilian casualties in wars, and I think we should have gone to actual war with Afghanistan, but this is the road we traveled, how can we prove our trustworthiness to them when we can only disprove it to our own people?

Nov 19, 2013 6:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.