Judge dismisses lawsuit by family of slain border agent

PHOENIX Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:26pm EST

Related Topics

PHOENIX (Reuters) - A wrongful death lawsuit brought by the family of slain Border Patrol agent Brian Terry has been dismissed by a federal judge on the grounds that a court settlement would interfere with the powers of the U.S. government, which has a compensation scheme of its own.

Terry died in a shoot-out with Mexican drug cartel gunmen in southern Arizona in December 2010 in a case tied to a flawed bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, or ATF, gun-running operation that embarrassed the Obama administration and strained relations with Mexico.

Last year Terry's parents, Kent and Josephine Terry, filed a $25 million wrongful-death claim against prosecutors and ATF agents alleging they acted in violation of their own policies and that so-called "Fast and Furious" operation negligently allowed the weapons to be bought by violent criminals.

In a written ruling released on Friday, District Judge David G. Campbell found that federal law and prior U.S. Supreme Court rulings barred such damages because the U.S. Congress has passed laws providing compensation - including death benefits - for survivors of federal officers killed in the line of duty.

"The Court recognizes that Plaintiffs have suffered a great loss, and that any financial remedy is likely insufficient to redress their injury," Campbell said in the eight-page ruling.

"But as the Supreme Court has made clear, the bedrock principle of separation of powers counsels against judicially-created remedies when Congress has established a remedial scheme," he added.

An attorney representing Terry's family said they planned to appeal the ruling.

Robert Heyer, Brian Terry's cousin and the chairman of the foundation set up in the fallen agent's name, said the family was disappointed by the ruling.

"We're reading over his order and it appears that he has ruled strictly on a technicality. He has not considered the basis of the claim that said that ATF and the U.S. Attorney's office had created a danger in their pursuit of this gun trafficking operation," Heyer told Reuters by telephone.

"This has never been about a financial amount, this is about gaining justice and holding those individuals accountable for their actions," he added.

The botched sting operation ran from late 2009 to early 2011 out of the Phoenix offices of the ATF and the U.S. Attorney.

The goal was to try to track guns bought by straw buyers with clean backgrounds to senior drug cartel members. However, in most cases ATF agents did not follow the guns beyond the initial buyer.

A number of guns bought in the scheme were recovered from crime scenes in Mexico. Two tracked by the ATF were also retrieved from a remote spot in southern Arizona where Terry was killed, although it was unclear if the weapons were used in his murder.

Terry's slaying set off a political firestorm when it brought to light the ATF sting in which about 2,000 weapons were sold to buyers believed to be straw purchasers for Mexico's powerful drug cartels.

Congressional Republicans slammed the government for the program, and called on Attorney General Eric Holder to resign. The program also strained ties between the Mexican and U.S. governments.

(Editing by Edith Honan, Eric M. Johnson and Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
The “secret tyranny” continues in full form. With Obama and Eric Holder sitting on the vital “Fast and Furious” evidence, this is a tough case to present, in the first place.

Currently, Holder is complicit in the suppression of the “Fast and Furious” evidence (demanded by Congress), thus, the U.S. Courts have a bizarre conflict of interest – add that Holder’s new Deputy is named as being directly complicit in the “Fast and Furious” operation. Holder’s previous Deputy refused to act on Holder’s “Contempt of Congress.”

With the FBI controlled by Holder; there’s no investigation or justice to be had.

The reaction by the Border Patrol Agents should be interesting.

If Monica’s blue dress is any indicator, Obama should have faced impeachment a long time ago. So much for “political theory.”

Given the current Beltway partisan political climate, the stakes in the 2014 mid-term elections and Hillary’s ambitions; something could change – but that is uniquely speculation, for the moment.

Nov 18, 2013 8:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
GSRyder wrote:
Politic amerika, The Toilet That Can’t Be Flushed . Those who make the rules, do so to their advantage . We the voters can not run all of them out, by design the festering will continue . The judges back up the congress, they all look out for one another . All those in power have a different set of rules . The term is colateral damage, a convienent “cristian” term if ever on existed .

Nov 19, 2013 6:01am EST  --  Report as abuse
Overcast451 wrote:
Yep, if it was the judge that ended up dead – I’m sure his family would be showered with cash.

Nov 19, 2013 3:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.