Progress emerges in U.S. budget talks; Murray sees path to deal

WASHINGTON Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:23pm EST

U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) (C) walks to a Senate Democratic caucus luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, October 15, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) (C) walks to a Senate Democratic caucus luncheon at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, October 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Signs of progress began to emerge in U.S. budget talks on Tuesday as top Senate Democratic negotiator Patty Murray said she sees a path toward an agreement to ease automatic spending cuts known as the "sequester."

Murray, asked if there was a path forward in her talks with her counterpart, Republican Representative Paul Ryan, said: "I believe there is."

The lawmakers are racing against a December 13 deadline for a deal, as Republican resistance to including new tax revenues continued to be a sticking point, according to a senator on the negotiating committee headed by Murray and Ryan.

On January 15, funds for many government activities will be exhausted. Without a budget deal by then, another government shutdown could occur.

Senator Murray, chairwoman of the Senate Budget Committee, did not elaborate on possible consensus in the talks but said the two were working toward a small deal.

Her comments echoed positive sentiments expressed by some Republican and Democratic aides, and by a fellow member of the budget-negotiating panel, Senator Angus King, an independent who votes with the Democrats.

King told reporters it was his impression the regular meetings between Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee, and Murray were yielding progress in the talks. But he added, "My understanding is there are major issues outstanding, the principal one being revenues."

Murray and other Democrats on the 29-member budget panel are seeking revenues from the closure of tax breaks for the wealthy and large corporations to replace part of the sequester cuts, which are due take a $91 billion bite out of funding for government agencies and discretionary programs next year.

Republicans have refused to consider such tax hikes and want to pay for any easing of the sequester with spending cuts on federal benefits programs.

The next round of across-the-board spending cuts known as "sequestration" are set to begin January 15, the same date that federal government funding expires again.

A spokesman for Ryan, of Wisconsin, declined to comment on the talks.

But Ryan, speaking at a Wall Street Journal forum, said he was comfortable predicting there would not be another government shutdown on January 15 because either he and Murray would reach a deal or funding would be extended at levels reduced by the sequester cuts.

"Either one of those two scenarios will prevail and we will not have another shutdown," he said.

He said he did not expect similar "theatrics" over the next debt-limit deadline in February because Republicans would shift away from trying to use it to stop "Obamacare" health reforms.

Ryan and Murray have been in contact daily since the negotiating panel's second public meeting last week, a senior Democratic aide said. "They wouldn't be having these continued conversations and they wouldn't be continuing to work if they didn't see some path to a deal," the aide said.

A House Republican aide also said Ryan had told some lawmakers in private conversations that he was close to a deal with Murray. But the aide did not provide any details.


The positive sentiments also came as Senator Mitch McConnell, the top Senate Republican, on Tuesday urged House Republicans to stand together in favor of keeping the sequester cuts in place with a $967 billion discretionary spending level for fiscal 2014 that began October 1.

Many Republicans have said that if the budget talks fail, they would simply keep this spending level in place, even if it means accepting bigger cuts to military spending. This would be preferable to any new revenues, they say.

But the party is beginning to splinter over the sequester cuts, indicating that there may not be enough Republican votes to approve the lower spending level of $967 billion. Democrats want to return to the pre-sequester level of $1.058 trillion for the current fiscal year.

It might be too difficult to pass a budget at the $967 billion level, creating an incentive for alternative deal.

The messy rollout of President Barack Obama's signature health care law offers another incentive for Republicans to cut a deal, said Jim Manley, a former aide to Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

"They want to focus, to the extent that they can, on Obamacare and not get sidetracked by budget debacles," said Manley, who noted the problems with the healthcare laws are creating political problems for Obama and Democrats.

McConnell's pitch in a closed-door meeting met resistance from some House Republicans, including Representative Scott Rigell, whose Virginia district is home to many naval installations in the Norfolk area that would suffer big cuts.

"Congressman Rigell did speak with the senator to make clear his views that the combination of sequester and continuing resolutions are damaging our military," said Rigell spokeswoman Kim Mosser Knapp.

And just hours after McConnell spoke to House Republicans, some of his own Senate Republicans also expressed their opposition to the scheduled spending cuts.

Five Senate Republicans joined 28 Democratic senators in a letter to Senate Budget Committee leaders urging robust funding for National Institutes of Health medical research. The first round of automatic spending cuts, which went into effect early this year, cut NIH funding by $1.55 billion, resulting in 640 fewer research projects being awarded, the 33 senators said.

(Additional reporting and writing by David Lawder; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
Jake987 wrote:
One more cave in by Republicans and they will she shocked at what happens next November.

Nov 19, 2013 9:21pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Daleville wrote:
If the Republicans don’t start compromising, they are going to be even more shell shocked next November.

I had always voted Republican until the last few years when the Tea Party idiots started pushing their candidates.

If the Republicans want to win, they had better stop worrying about the Tea Party twits and start worrying about the many more moderate Independent voters. They can’t win without us and the Tea Party is driving us away in droves.

Nov 20, 2013 1:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
simian wrote:
forget any notion of ever again offering 10 to one cuts to spending ratio. there have already been cuts to the poor in the reduction of food stamp benefits. next there will probably not be any more extended unemployment benefits, and then the again hurt the country with more cuts across the board. cuts cuts cuts seem to be the only jobs bill the right wing extremists will offer.
there are plenty of cuts–DOD, NSA, tax reform to end the tax dodges by individuals and corporations. we could easily reduce corporate taxes by 10% if we also made laws that would make them actually pay that rate. treat income as income so that there can’t be a preferred class of people paying that 15% romney/buffet rates.
at the worst we would offer 1 to 1 cuts versus revenue, but the revenue shortfall is the glaring problem.

Nov 20, 2013 1:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.