Senate Democrats stop filibusters on nominations

WASHINGTON Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:56pm EST

U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks at a dinner in honor of Presidential Medal of Freedom awardees at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in Washington, November 20, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks at a dinner in honor of Presidential Medal of Freedom awardees at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in Washington, November 20, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Democratic-led Senate, in a historic rule change, stripped Republicans on Thursday of their ability to block President Barack Obama's judicial and executive branch nominees.

On a nearly party-line vote of 52-48, Democrats abruptly changed the Senate's balance of power by reducing from 60 to 51 the number of votes needed to end procedural roadblocks known as filibusters against all presidential nominees, except those for the U.S. Supreme Court.

(Reporting by Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (81)
JeffWest wrote:
About time. The knee-jerk GOP rejection of everything and everyone Obama proposes is just red meat for their racist base, and they deserve every vote and every court decision that goes against them.

Nov 21, 2013 12:50pm EST  --  Report as abuse
When you have obstructionism on the level of the what the GOP is now doing, you have no choice but to change the rules.

Nov 21, 2013 12:53pm EST  --  Report as abuse
elpaso wrote:
Well, it’s about time.

Nov 21, 2013 12:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures