Hand over tax audit information, clock is running: IRS

WASHINGTON Fri Nov 22, 2013 5:23pm EST

A woman walks out of the Internal Revenue Service building in New York in this May 13, 2013 photo. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

A woman walks out of the Internal Revenue Service building in New York in this May 13, 2013 photo.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Internal Revenue Service audit, already a feared ordeal, will get even sharper teeth in January when the IRS will start setting strict deadlines for delivery of information it wants from companies and wealthy people it is auditing.

No such deadlines now exist. So taxpayers can put off IRS requests for documents or personal interviews and drag out audits for months, sometimes even years, said tax experts familiar with the rules.

The new deadlines will apply only to people or companies with more than $10 million in assets, the IRS said in a recent memo from its Large Business and International division.

Initial requests for information will continue to be made under flexible deadlines negotiated by an IRS agent and the taxpayer. If that deadline is not met, then under the new policy a 49-day clock will start ticking.

During that period, if the taxpayer does not comply, the IRS will issue two warnings, including possibly a notice to the company's chief financial officer.

After 49 days, if the information still is not divulged, the agency will go to court to seek a summons - a step that could expose the audit to the public and pose a risk to investors.

"It's a dramatic change and it has adverse consequences," said Larry Langdon, a former tax official at the IRS who also worked at Hewlett-Packard and is now with law firm Mayer Brown

LLP.

The new deadlines will have the biggest impact in "transfer pricing" audits, said Kevin Brown, a former IRS acting commissioner now at accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Transfer pricing is an area of frequent dispute involving how multinationals move and price capital and assets among units in different countries. Billions of dollars in disputed taxes can hinge on small details buried in a company's documents.

"I have heard anxiety expressed about the compressed timeframes," Brown said of the new deadlines. "It introduces an element of uncertainty and perhaps friction."

If the new timetables are strictly enforced, "we're going to see a whole lot more summons enforcement cases," said Armando Gomez, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.

An IRS summons request can signal IRS trouble for a company, risking a hit to the share price, Langdon said.

"That is a major downside risk," he said.

(Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Eric Walsh)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
COindependent wrote:
No, the major downside risk is that the individual is guilty until proven innocent by the IRS.

The IRS will continue to provide political leverage to politicians who need an obscure way to make life difficult for those who disagree with them. It is impossible to enforce 50,000 pages of tax code, some of which are in conflict with other regulations within that same code.

Ask anyone who has been audited, and you will find the individual citizen is at the mercy of some rank and file federal employee. Their only charter is to find something wrong and penalize you. All the while you incur the out-of-pocket expenses, with no opportunity for reimbursement, even if you are found not to be in error. And the federal government considers that “fair”.

Nov 22, 2013 7:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse
@coindependent, from the article this seems more directed at companies then individuals. And it seems to me if you have nothing to hide you would want to have audit over ASAP, so one should have no problem handing documents over quickly. But on the other hand if you do have something to hide……

I hate paying taxes as much as the next person, but I also realize it is part of living in a civilized society.

Nov 23, 2013 10:55am EST  --  Report as abuse
kbill wrote:
“Hugo” is alive and well in D.C.

Nov 23, 2013 1:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures