'Penniless' man is worth $65 million, court rules - and must give wife half

LONDON Sat Nov 23, 2013 10:29am EST

Michelle Young arrives at The Royal Courts of Justice in London April 13, 2011. REUTERS/Toby Melville

Michelle Young arrives at The Royal Courts of Justice in London April 13, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Toby Melville

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - One of Britain's longest and most bitter divorce battles culminated on Friday with a High Court judge branding a well-connected millionaire a liar and his ex-wife a conspiracy theorist.

Far from being "penniless and hopelessly bankrupt", as he had claimed, Scot Young, 51, was worth 40 million pounds ($65 million) and his estranged wife Michelle Young, 49, should get half of it, judge Philip Moor ruled.

"This case has been quite extraordinary even by the standards of the most bitter of matrimonial breakdowns," Moor wrote in his ruling, noting that it had taken over six years and 65 court hearings to come to trial.

The case has made headlines in Britain because of the size of the claims and the fact that Scot Young has enjoyed financial help from high-profile friends including Philip Green, the billionaire owner of the Topshop retail chain.

Michelle Young has run up legal bills of 6.5 million pounds, while Scot Young has served six months in jail for failing to provide full and frank disclosure of his assets.

The pair were married for 17 years until 2006 and enjoyed a lavish lifestyle of mansions, jet-setting holidays and gifts of diamond jewelry funded by Scot Young's investments in property, technology and start-up companies.

It all fell apart when the marriage breakdown coincided with what the husband described as a total meltdown of his business empire that left him "penniless and hopelessly bankrupt" with unpaid debts of 28 million pounds.

The judge said it was impossible to know the full truth of his financial position due to "the significant number of lies told by the husband to so many people over such a long period".

He ordered Young to pay his ex-wife a lump sum of 20 million pounds within 28 days.

Michelle Young maintains that the meltdown was a fiction specifically designed to hide her ex-husband's wealth and deprive her and the couple's two daughters of their rightful share - a version of events also rejected by the judge.

"She sees conspiracy everywhere," he wrote.

A furious Michelle Young branded the ruling "disgraceful".

"I stand by what I said. He's worth billions," she told reporters outside the court, according to reports in several British national media. She also issued a written statement in which she called her ex-husband a "maniac".

(Editing by Andrew Roche)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Burns0011 wrote:
He probably is NOT ‘worth billions’. It’s likely this couple never talked seriously about money and never cooperated in figuring out his assets while they were still happy together.

He probably IS worth what the judge estimated his worth to be. Short of ordering a forensic accounting of the man’s assets, the judge’s estimate is likely to be in the ballpark.

The judge is probably wrong, and the wife is probably correct, to say that this man deliberately hid assets in order to keep them from her, from his family, and from his creditors.

Nov 24, 2013 12:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Andrewp111 wrote:
Maybe he buried money or gold that can be found by treasure hunters. This might be worth some exploring for those who do that sort of thing.

Nov 25, 2013 6:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BigMoses wrote:
She got 20 million. out of that she has already incurred debt of 6.5 million (how the hell do you do that??) and has to give the lawyers a 1/3 share in the case for winning. So she gets about 6 million and the lawyers get about 14 million. Who said being a Liar….. I mean Lawyer was a bad thing??

Nov 27, 2013 10:38am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.