EU demands protection against U.S. data surveillance

BRUSSELS Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:12pm EST

European Union Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding addresses the European Parliament's Committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs in Brussels June 19, 2013. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir

European Union Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding addresses the European Parliament's Committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs in Brussels June 19, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Francois Lenoir

Related Topics

Photo

Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Commission called on Tuesday for new protection for Europeans under United States' law against misuse of personal data, in an attempt to keep in check the U.S. surveillance revealed by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

EU justice commissioner Viviane Reding said she wanted Washington to follow through on its promise to give all EU citizens the right to sue in the United States if their data is misused. "I have ... made clear that Europe expects to see the necessary legislative change in the U.S. sooner rather than later, and in any case before summer 2014," she said.

Reding's message was reinforced in a draft report obtained by Reuters that called for "very close attention by the EU" in monitoring data-exchange agreements given the "large-scale collection and processing of personal information under U.S. surveillance programs".

The remarks underline a growing sense of unease in Europe at a delicate moment in transatlantic relations, when the globe's two biggest economies seek a trade pact to deepen ties.

Just months after U.S. officials confirmed the existence of PRISM, a program to collect data from Google, Facebook and other U.S. companies, European experts vented their frustration.

"EU citizens do not enjoy the same rights and procedural safeguards as Americans," officials wrote, when exploring data transfers.

In the report, they highlighted the need for improving transparency in the 'Safe Harbour' scheme that allows companies in Europe who gather personal information about customers, for example, to send it to the United States.

But some believe that the stance of the EU's executive, which writes laws for the 28 countries in the union, is feeble.

"We are an economic giant and we behave like a political midget," said Sophie in 't Veld, a Dutch member of the European Parliament. "The Commission and the member states are extremely timid and soft. They are failing their citizens."

"It's not a legal question," she said. "It's about Europe behaving like a politically self-confident entity."

In 't Veld is a member of the European Parliament's civil liberties committee, which recently voted for a tougher data privacy regime in Europe.

That vote cleared the way for negotiations with member states, with the aim of having a new code of conduct agreed by May next year, the first fundamental updating of Europe's data protection laws since 1995.

As well as stiff fines for companies that break the rules, the new regime would oblige companies to seek consent before using personal information.

It would block data-sharing with non-EU countries unless approved by an EU supervisor and establish the "right to erasure" - the ability for consumers to request the deletion of their digital trace, including photographs, emails and Internet postings.

But Mark Watts of London law firm Bristows said Europe's approach was misguided.

"The data protection regulation is not ambitious at all," he said. "Much of it is based on old legislation before the world wide web even existed."

(Additional reporting by Tom K├Ârkemeier)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (20)
SeniorMoment wrote:
The EU can’t legislate what any other nation does outside the EU, and indeed there have been reports that it is spy agencies inside the EU governments that have provided the communications intercept data. The privacy we knew as children doesn’t exist anywhere in the world where modern communications are used and the bottle containing our privacy is not one that can be technologically corked.

Nov 26, 2013 10:20am EST  --  Report as abuse
1) The Constitution doesn’t guarantee rights to anyone except US citizens.

2) It’s absurd to think that asking another country to “Stop spying on us!” is even an option.

The US has every right to spy on other countries, and they have every right to spy on us. It’s part of international diplomacy, the shady underhanded part. The only real rule here is “Don’t get caught”.

Nov 26, 2013 10:59am EST  --  Report as abuse
majkmushrm wrote:
Dear USofRationality. The US does not have the “right” to spy on anybody but they do have, currently, the power to do so. The spyee, however, does have the right to take steps to thwart the spyer. People are beginning to realize that if effective steps are taken to thwart the US, the results will be suboptimal for the world as a whole. What’s different with the NSA spying is that it isn’t directed just at foreign governments but also includes all their citizens as well. But since you think that the US has the right to spy on god and the gang, I assume you accept that the Chinese have that same right and were at the forefront of people telling the USG to sit down and shut up instead of bitching about Chinese hacking of American networks.

Nov 26, 2013 12:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.