Free Syrian Army says no ceasefire for Geneva talks

BEIRUT Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:24am EST

Free Syrian Army fighters joke around by using a slingshot to throw a shoe in Deir al-Zor, eastern Syria, November 24, 2013. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi

Free Syrian Army fighters joke around by using a slingshot to throw a shoe in Deir al-Zor, eastern Syria, November 24, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Khalil Ashawi

BEIRUT (Reuters) - The commander of the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA) said on Tuesday his group would shun a planned peace conference in Switzerland in January and would pursue its fight to topple President Bashar al-Assad regardless.

General Salim Idriss's stance highlights how hard it will be for international mediators to get Syria's warring and divided parties to the negotiating table in Geneva.

The "Geneva 2" conference will convene on January 22, the United Nations said on Monday, with the stated goal of agreeing a transitional government to end a 2-1/2-year-old conflict that has killed well over 100,000 people and displaced millions more.

"Conditions are not suitable for running the Geneva 2 talks at the given date and we, as a military and revolutionary force, will not participate in the conference," Idriss said.

"We will not stop combat at all during the Geneva conference or after it, and what concerns us is getting needed weapons for our fighters," he told Al Jazeera television.

The diplomacy has brought no let-up in the violence.

A suicide bomber killed 15 people and wounded more than 30 at a bus station in a suburb west of Damascus, state media said.

Heavy fighting has raged for days outside the capital Damascus and the northern city of Aleppo, with rebels reporting small gains after months of losing momentum to Assad's forces.

Assad, emboldened by a string of military successes, has said he will send delegates to the Geneva talks but will accept no preconditions and will put any agreement to a referendum - a vote which opposition figures say will be rigged against them.

The Western-backed FSA is an umbrella group encompassing many rebel units, but opposition sources and analysts say its influence has already been eroded by Islamist groups which are forging alliances among the most powerful rebel forces.

OPPOSITION SPLITS

The opposition has been badly divided over Geneva 2. The Syrian National Coalition, a grouping also supported by the West, has announced conditional readiness to join the talks, despite objections from fighters and activists inside Syria.

Opposition figures in Istanbul said some coalition members were in talks in Geneva with the U.N. envoy for Syria, Lakhdar Brahimi, as well with officials from the United States and Russia, the main architects of the planned peace conference.

The coalition spokesman, Khaled Saleh, said it would meet again on December 15 to decide whether to attend the talks.

He said the group wanted to know whether Assad and foreign powers would meet its demands for the creation of humanitarian aid corridors and the release of political prisoners.

"If they made sure the conditions for Geneva were there, we could have held Geneva tomorrow. Instead of focusing on the success of Geneva, they were focusing on the date," he said.

Anti-Assad demonstrations began in March 2011. Their violent suppression ignited a conflict that has split Syria among ethnic and religious factions backed by competing foreign powers. It has also inflamed regional Sunni-Shi'ite sectarian tensions.

The mostly Sunni rebels are wary of the Geneva conference, which they fear will not ensure Assad's exit from power.

In the opposition-held suburbs of Damascus, activists said rebels were advancing slowly near the international airport road against heavy resistance from Assad's forces backed by Shi'ite Lebanese Hezbollah fighters and the Abu Fadl al-Abbas brigades, a militia made up of foreign Shi'ite militants.

Foreign Sunni militants, many of them linked to al Qaeda, are also fighting alongside Assad's opponents.

Rebels east of Damascus are struggling to break a blockade that has cut off most food, supplies and weapons for six months.

In northern Syria, they have been fighting an offensive by Assad's forces in a previously rebel-dominated region. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a pro-opposition monitoring group, said rebels had seized several villages but had been unable to block a highway to prevent a further army advance.

IRAN TO ATTEND IF INVITED

After so much bloodshed, each side in Syria sees the war as a struggle for survival, but neither has gained military supremacy, giving mediators a chance to argue for compromise.

The involvement of neighboring powers in the conflict risks prolonging the violence and spreading it beyond Syria's borders.

Shi'ite Iran supports Assad, whose Alawite sect derives from Shi'ite Islam. Sunni Saudi Arabia is backing the rebels.

It is unclear if Iran, which agreed a preliminary nuclear deal with world powers on Sunday, will attend the Syria talks.

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said on Tuesday his country would take part if invited, adding that it would in any event work for a peaceful solution.

"Participation of Iran in Geneva 2 is in our view an important contribution to the resolution of the problem. We have said all along that if Iran is invited, we will participate without any preconditions," Zarif told Iran's Press TV.

Western powers have questioned whether Iran should be invited because it has yet to endorse the outcome of a 2012 Geneva conference which forms the basis for the January talks.

This says a future Syrian government must be formed by "mutual consent" of the authorities and the opposition, a stance the United States says means Assad cannot stay in power.

(Additional reporting by Oliver Holmes in Beirut and Isabel Coles in Dubai; Editing by Alistair Lyon)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Slammy wrote:
Wasn’t this meeting first scheduled for last May?

Nov 26, 2013 9:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
chekovmerlin wrote:
There are so many quips to this story aimed at the FSA and other rebel groups: “I’d rather die than have a chance at peace.” “My way or the highway.” “I don’t want peace, I want total victory.” “I’m not interested in Syria and Syrians. I’m only interested in ruling.” This shows the Sunni part of the equation is not interested in peace, salvation for the Syrians, but only in destroying those they hate (Shi’ite and Christian). Well done, FSA. You’ve really shown your true colors.

Nov 26, 2013 1:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
QuidProQuo wrote:
“We will not stop combat at all during the Geneva conference or after it, and what concerns us is getting needed weapons for our fighters,” he told Al Jazeera television.

These revolutionary freaks are hell bent not on securing Syria, stabilizing Syria, or even trying any form of democracy. They have no respect from me. I don’t think it is in anyone’s best interest to have Assad taken out. There is no need for another country to be radicalized, unstable, and out of control like it is in Libya and Egypt. If these idiots can’t even hold a ceasefire for a couple of days, I do question where their hearts truly are. NO WEAPONS should go to them. They are not recongized as being better for Syria nor are they willing to even consider diversity in Syria’s governing. Heck with them all. I had hoped for both sides to go to the table and put a stop to the out of control antics but apparently the Syrian Revolutionary side has plans of their own.

Nov 26, 2013 3:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.