Supreme Court agrees to review presidential protest case

WASHINGTON Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:36pm EST

A man holds an umbrella outside the U..S. Supreme Court in Washington June 10, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

A man holds an umbrella outside the U..S. Supreme Court in Washington June 10, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to decide whether two U.S. Secret Service agents can be sued for allegedly treating protesters gathered in support of former President George W. Bush more favorably than protesters critical of him.

Agents Tim Wood and Rob Savage, backed by the administration of President Barack Obama, appealed a lower court ruling that allowed the lawsuit against them to move forward.

The case concerns an incident that took place on October 14, 2004, when Bush, then president, was staying at the Jacksonville Inn in Jacksonville, Oregon.

When the president decided to eat on an outdoor patio, the Secret Service agents moved anti-Bush protesters who had gathered outside the inn. After the move, the anti-Bush protesters were further from the president than some pro-Bush demonstrators who also gathered near the inn.

Seven of the anti-Bush protesters filed a lawsuit in 2009 claiming that the agents violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution's ban on viewpoint discrimination by treating the two groups differently and effectively suppressing their free speech rights.

A federal judge in Oregon refused to dismiss the case in an October 29 decision that was upheld by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in April 2012.

On behalf of the Obama administration, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli said that the case should be dismissed because the plaintiffs failed to show that the agents had intent to discriminate.

Oral arguments and a decision are expected by the end of June.

The case is Wood v. Moss, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 13-115.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Howard Goller and Vicki Allen)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
RobLangley wrote:
The Secret Service’s job is to protect the president.

Pro-Bush protesters pose less of a security threat than anti-Bush protesters. That is common sense.

Nov 26, 2013 1:41pm EST  --  Report as abuse
@RobLangley, Your argument is invalid, if you where trying to harm the President one would probably act like they where part of the pro crowd to get closer access.

Nov 26, 2013 2:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
wcc335 wrote:
@USAPragmatist2 or maybe you would act like a protestor because you knew that the Secret Service would know that you would act like a supporter if you really wanted to harm the president.

Nov 26, 2013 3:14pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.