U.S. affirms support for Japan in islands dispute with China

WASHINGTON Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:21pm EST

1 of 2. Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force's PC3 surveillance plane flies around the disputed islands in the East China Sea, known as the Senkaku isles in Japan and Diaoyu in China, in this October 13, 2011 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Kyodo/Files

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States pledged support for ally Japan on Wednesday in a growing dispute with China over islands in the East China Sea and senior U.S. administration officials accused Beijing of behavior that had unsettled its neighbors.

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel assured his Japanese counterpart in a phone call that the two nations' defense pact covered the small islands where China established a new airspace defense zone last week and commended Tokyo "for exercising appropriate restraint," a Pentagon spokesman said.

China's declaration raised the stakes in a territorial standoff between Beijing and Tokyo over the area, which includes the tiny uninhabited islands known as the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyu in China.

The United States defied China's demand that airplanes flying near the islands identify themselves to Chinese authorities, flying two unarmed B-52 bombers over the islands on Tuesday without informing Beijing.

It was a sharp reminder to China that the United States still maintains a large military presence in the region despite concerns among U.S. allies that President Barack Obama's "pivot to Asia" strategy has borne little fruit.

In a previously announced trip, Vice President Joe Biden will visit China, Japan and South Korea next week. He will seek to ease tensions heightened by China's declaration, senior administration officials said.

Washington does not take a position on the sovereignty of the islands but recognizes that Tokyo has administrative control over them and the United States is therefore bound to defend Japan in the event of an armed conflict.

Some experts say the Chinese move was aimed at eroding Tokyo's claim to administrative control over the area.

China's Defense Ministry said it had monitored the U.S. bombers on Tuesday. A Pentagon spokesman said the planes had not been observed or contacted by Chinese aircraft.

'FRICTION AND UNCERTAINTY'

In a conference call with reporters, senior U.S. administration officials said China's declaration raised serious concerns about its intentions.

"It causes friction and uncertainty, it constitutes a unilateral change to the status quo in the region, a region that's already fraught. And it increases the risk of miscalculation and accidents," one of the officials said.

China's declaration of a defense zone affects not only Japan but aircraft from other countries throughout the world that routinely fly over the area.

The U.S. government has advised U.S. airlines to take necessary steps to operate safely over the East China Sea.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the United States was trying to determine whether China's new rules apply to commercial airlines in addition to military aircraft.

Asked whether U.S. carriers would advise Chinese officials of their flight plans, Psaki said, "I wouldn't go that far, we're still looking at it."

Biden will raise the issue of the defense zone directly with policymakers in Beijing, the official said. "It also allows the vice president to make the broader point that there's an emerging pattern of behavior that is unsettling to China's own neighbors."

The official said it raised questions about "how China operates in international space and how China deals with areas of disagreement with its neighbors."

The Pentagon signaled that more military flights into the defense zone claimed by China can be expected.

Colonel Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, told Reuters, "We'll continue to conduct operations in the region, as we have" in the past. He declined to offer details on timing.

In addition to the U.S. B-52 flights on Tuesday, flights of Japan's main airline similarly ignored Chinese authorities while flying through the zone.

Japan Airlines and ANA Holdings said they had stopped giving flight plans and other information to Chinese authorities following a request from the Japanese government.

Both said they had not experienced any problems when passing through the zone. Japan's aviation industry association said it had concluded there was no threat to passenger safety by ignoring the Chinese demands, JAL said.

(Reporting by Mark Felsenthal, David Alexander, Phil Stewart and Lesley Wroughton; Writing by Jim Loney and Alistair Bell; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (34)
GDSAVTHQN wrote:
Any objective survey of the facts would contradict Japan’s claim to these islands. Breathtakingly bogus.
Unoccupied islands have always been volunerable to anexation by expansionist nations and China should have been more protective of their claimed islands given this historical fact.
Interesting that the US & Japan do not call for UN intervention to settle the dispute.
If Japan wants the islands let them defend their claim. The US should back-up before it once again finds itself on the wrong side of history. You can only stick your finger in someones eye so many times before they realize its not an accident.

Nov 27, 2013 12:24pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Japan to China: “Don’t be mad at the rocks that I got.”

China really needs to quit blocking Google Earth from their servers. They would become so much smarter.

Nov 27, 2013 12:47pm EST  --  Report as abuse
From the article: “Washington does not take a position on the sovereignty of the islands but recognizes that Tokyo has administrative control over them and the United States is therefore bound to defend Japan in the event of an armed conflict.”

How much money has Japan contributed to the US Treasury lately?

Same goes for all the other countries that are entitled to US military protection….Israel, for example, receives 3 billion per year in US aid and enjoys the free-of-charge protection of the US armed forces….time to bring the troops home and let neighborhood feuds resolve themselves without counter-productive US meddling.

Nov 27, 2013 12:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.