Afghan president condemns U.S. airstrike that killed a child

KABUL Thu Nov 28, 2013 3:24pm EST

Afghan President Hamid Karzai speaks during the last day of the Loya Jirga, in Kabul November 24, 2013. REUTERS/Omar Sobhani

Afghan President Hamid Karzai speaks during the last day of the Loya Jirga, in Kabul November 24, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Omar Sobhani

Related Topics

KABUL (Reuters) - President Hamid Karzai said U.S. forces had bombed a home in southern Afghanistan, killing a small child and wounding two women, and condemned the attack as a sign of disregard for civilian lives, his spokesman said on Thursday.

The strike could not have come at a worse time, as Karzai is engaged in a stand-off with the U.S. government over a bilateral security agreement that will decide whether U.S. troop stay in Afghanistan beyond 2014.

"It shows that U.S. forces have no respect for the decisions of the Loya Jirga and life of civilians in Afghanistan," said Karzai's spokesman, Aimal Faizi.

"If such operations continue, there will be no agreement."

The United States has threatened to pull its troops out of Afghanistan after 2014 - an outcome known as the "zero option", as it did in Iraq two years ago - unless a deal is clinched by the end of this year,

Karzai, however, has so far refused to sign, despite getting approval from the Loya Jirga last week. The council almost unanimously advised him to seal the agreement promptly, saying this was in the national interest.

Karzai instead has refused and made additional demands on the United States, including the return of all Afghan prisoners from its prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The child killed in Thursday's bombing was two or three years old, Faizi said, adding that the attack took place after the targeted individual ran into a home for safety.

"They give no importance to the life of civilians. They are killing civilians like flies," Faizi said.

"That should have been a red line for them... Even if he was an insurgent they shouldn't have fired on the house."

A man was killed in a separate strike in the same province on Thursday afternoon, Faizi added. Local officials had yet to confirm whether the victim was an insurgent or not.

(Reporting by Jessica Donati and Mirwais Harooni; editing by Mark Trevelyan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (14)
RMax304823 wrote:
Assuming it’s true, it’s hard to blame Karzai. No wonder he wants us out of there except for his personal armed reserve.

It doesn’t make Karzai a more admirable man. His administration is thoroughly corrupt in a way it never was under the Taliban.

Nov 28, 2013 4:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
expat75 wrote:
When the Taliban were in power in Afghanistan, poppy growing was made illegal and by the time of the American invasion, it had been reduced by 90%. The world would have been a better place over the past 60 years if America had pursued its 19th century isolationist policy.

Nov 28, 2013 5:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
dd606 wrote:
I’m sure him ranting about this, has nothing to do with the stalled deal.

It’s estimated that over 3/4 of civilian deaths in Afghanistan this year, were deliberately done by the Taliban… ie: They deliberately targeted civilians. It wasn’t an accident or miscalculation… they purposely went out to blow up and/or kill civilians. Some were outright executions. He seems to be very good at ignoring all of those civilian deaths. And the ANA never kills anybody by accident. They’re such a bunch of crack troops… Very professional.

Just more typical hypocrisy from the muslim nuts… When a single person is accidentally killed by the US: Outrage. Dozens of people deliberately blown up by extremists: Silence.

Nov 28, 2013 5:41pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.